Monitoring of antiretroviral therapy and mortality in HIV programmes in Malawi, South Africa and Zambia: mathematical modelling study

Estill, Janne; Egger, Matthias; Johnson, Leigh F.; Gsponer, Thomas; Wandeler, Gilles; Davies, Mary-Ann; Boulle, Andrew; Wood, Robin; Garone, Daniela; Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.; Hallett, Timothy B.; Keiser, Olivia (2013). Monitoring of antiretroviral therapy and mortality in HIV programmes in Malawi, South Africa and Zambia: mathematical modelling study. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e57611. Public Library of Science 10.1371/journal.pone.0057611

Preview	Text Estill PLoSOne 2013.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (244kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Estill PLoSOne 2013_suppl.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (820kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES

Mortality in patients starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) is higher in Malawi and Zambia than in South Africa. We examined whether different monitoring of ART (viral load [VL] in South Africa and CD4 count in Malawi and Zambia) could explain this mortality difference.

DESIGN

Mathematical modelling study based on data from ART programmes.

METHODS

We used a stochastic simulation model to study the effect of VL monitoring on mortality over 5 years. In baseline scenario A all parameters were identical between strategies except for more timely and complete detection of treatment failure with VL monitoring. Additional scenarios introduced delays in switching to second-line ART (scenario B) or higher virologic failure rates (due to worse adherence) when monitoring was based on CD4 counts only (scenario C). Results are presented as relative risks (RR) with 95% prediction intervals and percent of observed mortality difference explained.

RESULTS

RRs comparing VL with CD4 cell count monitoring were 0.94 (0.74-1.03) in scenario A, 0.94 (0.77-1.02) with delayed switching (scenario B) and 0.80 (0.44-1.07) when assuming a 3-times higher rate of failure (scenario C). The observed mortality at 3 years was 10.9% in Malawi and Zambia and 8.6% in South Africa (absolute difference 2.3%). The percentage of the mortality difference explained by VL monitoring ranged from 4% (scenario A) to 32% (scenarios B and C combined, assuming a 3-times higher failure rate). Eleven percent was explained by non-HIV related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

VL monitoring reduces mortality moderately when assuming improved adherence and decreased failure rates.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

459 since deposited on 12 Feb 2014
40 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item