Chlamydia prevalence in young attenders of rural and regional primary care services in Australia: a cross-sectional survey.

Yeung, Anna H.; Temple-Smith, Meredith; Fairley, Christopher K.; Vaisey, Alaina M.; Guy, Rebecca; Law, Matthew G.; Low, Nicola; Bingham, Amie L.; Gunn, Jane; Kaldor, John; Donovan, Basil; Hocking, Jane S. (2014). Chlamydia prevalence in young attenders of rural and regional primary care services in Australia: a cross-sectional survey. Medical Journal of Australia, 200(3), pp. 170-175. Australasian Medical Publishing Company Ltd 10.5694/mja13.10729

	Text Yeung MedJAustralia 2014.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (307kB) | Request a copy
Preview	Text Yeung MedJAustralia 2014_manuscript.pdf - Submitted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (328kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVE

To estimate chlamydia prevalence among 16-29-year-olds attending general practice clinics in Australia.

DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

A cross-sectional survey was conducted from May 2010 to December 2012. Sexually experienced 16-29-year-olds were recruited from 134 general practice clinics in 54 rural and regional towns in four states and in nine metropolitan clinics (consecutive patients were invited to participate). Participants completed a questionnaire and were tested for chlamydia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Chlamydia prevalence.

RESULTS

Of 4284 participants, 197 tested positive for chlamydia (4.6%; 95% CI, 3.9%-5.3%). Prevalence was similar in men (5.2% [65/1257]; 95% CI, 3.9%-6.4%) and women (4.4% [132/3027]; 95% CI, 3.5%-5.2%) (P = 0.25) and high in those reporting genital symptoms or a partner with a sexually transmissible infection (STI) - 17.0% in men (8/47; 95% CI, 2.8%-31.2%); 9.5% in women (16/169; 95% CI, 5.1%-13.8%). Nearly three-quarters of cases (73.4% [130/177]) were diagnosed in asymptomatic patients attending for non-sexual health reasons, and 83.8% of all participants (3258/3890) had attended for non-sexual health reasons. Prevalence was slightly higher in participants from rural and regional areas (4.8% [179/3724]; 95% CI, 4.0%-5.6%) than those from metropolitan areas (3.1% [17/548]; 95% CI, 1.5%-4.7%) (P = 0.08). In multivariable analysis, increasing partner numbers in previous 12 months (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] for three or more partners, 5.11 [95% CI, 2.35-11.08]), chlamydia diagnosis in previous 12 months (AOR, 4.35 [95% CI, 1.52-12.41]) and inconsistent condom use with most recent partner (AOR, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.31-6.40]) were significantly associated with chlamydia in men. In women, increasing partner numbers in previous 12 months (AOR for two partners, 2.59 [95% CI, 1.59-4.23]; AOR for three or more partners, 3.58 [95% CI, 2.26-5.68]), chlamydia diagnosis in previous 12 months (AOR, 3.13 [95% CI, 1.62-6.06]) and age (AOR for 25-29-year-olds, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.12-0.44]) were associated with chlamydia.

CONCLUSIONS

Chlamydia prevalence is similar in young men and women attending general practice. Testing only those with genital symptoms or a partner with an STI would have missed three-quarters of cases. Most men and women are amenable to being tested in general practice, even in rural and regional areas.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

391 since deposited on 28 Jul 2014
39 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item