Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Worni, Mathias; Akushevich, Igor; Greenup, Rachel; Sarma, Deba; Ryser, Marc D; Myers, Evan R; Hwang, E Shelley (2015). Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Journal of the National Cancer Institute JNCI, 107(12), djv263. Oxford University Press 10.1093/jnci/djv263

Preview	Text Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ..pdf - Published Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (6MB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Proof) Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)_Proof.pdf - Submitted Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (1MB) | Preview
	Text Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS).pdf - Draft Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (259kB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND

Impact of contemporary treatment of pre-invasive breast cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) on long-term outcomes remains poorly defined. We aimed to evaluate national treatment trends for DCIS and to determine their impact on disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry was queried for patients diagnosed with DCIS from 1991 to 2010. Treatment pattern trends were analyzed using Cochran-Armitage trend test. Survival analyses were performed using inverse probability weights (IPW)-adjusted competing risk analyses for DSS and Cox proportional hazard regression for OS. All tests performed were two-sided.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one thousand and eighty DCIS patients were identified. The greatest proportion of patients was treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy (43.0%), followed by lumpectomy alone (26.5%) and unilateral (23.8%) or bilateral mastectomy (4.5%) with significant shifts over time. The rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy increased from 9.7% to 67.1% for mastectomy and from 1.4% to 17.8% for lumpectomy. Compared with mastectomy, OS was higher for lumpectomy with radiation (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76 to 0.83, P < .001) and lower for lumpectomy alone (HR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.23, P < .001). IPW-adjusted ten-year DSS was highest in lumpectomy with XRT (98.9%), followed by mastectomy (98.5%), and lumpectomy alone (98.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified substantial shifts in treatment patterns for DCIS from 1991 to 2010. When outcomes between locoregional treatment options were compared, we observed greater differences in OS than DSS, likely reflecting both a prevailing patient selection bias as well as clinically negligible differences in breast cancer outcomes between groups.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

271 since deposited on 30 Mar 2016
51 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item