“Proximising” climate change reconsidered: A construal level theory perspective

Brügger, Adrian; Morton, T. A.; Dessai, Suraje (2016). “Proximising” climate change reconsidered: A construal level theory perspective. Journal of environmental psychology, 46, pp. 125-142. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.004

	Text 1-s2.0-S0272494416300238-main.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (569kB) | Request a copy
Preview	Text Bruegger_Morton_Dessai_JEP_April_2016%20_1.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (296kB) | Preview

Reducing the psychological distance of climate change has repeatedly been proposed as one strategy to increase individuals' motivation to respond to climate change. From the perspective of construal level theory, decreasing psychological distance should not itself influence people's willingness to act but change the processes that underlie individual decision-making. We conducted two experiments in which we manipulated the psychological distance of climate change. We found that participants with a distant focus relied more on scepticism to represent risks and make decisions about supporting climate change, whereas participants with a proximal perspective relied more on fear when making such judgements. However, the predicted Fear × Distance interaction was only found when self-reported fear rather than experimentally manipulated fear was used as a moderator. Our results suggest that simply proximising won't increase engagement and call for a more differentiated perspective on the effects of psychological distance in the context of climate change.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

764 since deposited on 13 Jul 2016
16 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item