Epicardial phrenic nerve displacement during catheter ablation of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias: procedural experience and outcomes.

Kumar, Saurabh; Barbhaiya, Chirag R; Baldinger, Samuel Hannes; Koplan, Bruce A; Maytin, Melanie; Epstein, Laurence M; John, Roy M; Michaud, Gregory F; Tedrow, Usha B; Stevenson, William G (2015). Epicardial phrenic nerve displacement during catheter ablation of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias: procedural experience and outcomes. Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 8(4), pp. 896-904. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002818

[img] Text
896.full.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (2MB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmia origin in close proximity to the phrenic nerve (PN) can hinder successful catheter ablation. We describe our approach with epicardial PN displacement in such instances.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PN displacement via percutaneous pericardial access was attempted in 13 patients (age 49±16 years, 9 females) with either atrial tachycardia (6 patients) or atrial fibrillation triggered from a superior vena cava focus (1 patient) adjacent to the right PN or epicardial ventricular tachycardia origin adjacent to the left PN (6 patients). An epicardially placed steerable sheath/4 mm-catheter combination (5 patients) or a vascular or an esophageal balloon (8 patients) was ultimately successful. Balloon placement was often difficult requiring manipulation via a steerable sheath. In 2 ventricular tachycardia cases, absence of PN capture was achieved only once the balloon was directly over the ablation catheter. In 3 atrial tachycardia patients, PN displacement was not possible with a balloon; however, a steerable sheath/catheter combination was ultimately successful. PN displacement allowed acute abolishment of all targeted arrhythmias. No PN injury occurred acutely or in follow up. Two patients developed acute complications (pleuro-pericardial fistula 1 and pericardial bleeding 1). Survival free of target arrhythmia was achieved in all atrial tachycardia patients; however, a nontargeted ventricular tachycardia recurred in 1 patient at a median of 13 months' follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

Arrhythmias originating in close proximity to the PN can be targeted successfully with PN displacement with an epicardially placed steerable sheath/catheter combination, or balloon, but this strategy can be difficult to implement. Better tools for phrenic nerve protection are desirable.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Cardiovascular Disorders (DHGE) > Clinic of Cardiology

UniBE Contributor:

Baldinger, Samuel Hannes

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1941-3084

Publisher:

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Language:

English

Submitter:

Samuel Hannes Baldinger

Date Deposited:

30 Jun 2016 09:50

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 14:56

Publisher DOI:

10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002818

PubMed ID:

25963395

Uncontrolled Keywords:

atrial fibrillation; atrial tachycardia; catheter ablation; phrenic nerve; phrenic nerve injury; phrenic nerve protection; ventricular tachycardia

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.83888

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/83888

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback