Drivers for Policy Agreement in Nascent Subsystems: An Application of the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Fracking Policy in Switzerland and the UK

Ingold, Karin; Fischer, Manuel; Cairney, Paul (2016). Drivers for Policy Agreement in Nascent Subsystems: An Application of the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Fracking Policy in Switzerland and the UK (In Press). Policy studies journal, pp. 1-22. Policy Studies Organization 10.1111/psj.12173

[img] Text
Ingold_et_al-2016-Policy_Studies_Journal.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (178kB) | Request a copy
[img] Text
PostPrint.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License BORIS Standard License.

Download (267kB) | Request a copy
[img] Text
PostPrint.pdf
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License BORIS Standard License.

Download (267kB) | Request a copy

The study of public policy deals with subsystems in which actors cooperate or compete to turn their beliefs into policy solutions. Yet, most studies concern mature subsystems in which the main actors and their allies and enemies can easily be identified. This paper tackles the challenge of studying nascent subsystems, in which actors have begun to engage in politics but are uncertain about other actors’ beliefs. Actors therefore find it relatively difficult to identify their allies and opponents. Focusing on the Advocacy Coalition Framework, we examine three main ways in which actors might agree to support the same policy design before they decide whether or not to form long-term relationships within advocacy coalitions: they see the issue through the same lenses, they follow leaders, or they know each other from earlier cooperation. We use the case of fracking policy in Switzerland and the UK as a key example, in which actors have begun to agree with each other, but where final policy outputs were not yet defined, and long-term relationships not yet observable. We find that, when dealing with new issues, actors strongly rely on former contacts rather than shared ideologies or leadership.

Item Type: Journal Article (Original Article)
Division/Institute: 03 Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Institute of Political Science
10 Strategic Research Centers > Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (OCCR)
10 Strategic Research Centers > Centre for Development and Environment (CDE)
UniBE Contributor: Ingold, Karin Mirjam and Fischer, Manuel
Subjects: 300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 320 Political science
ISSN: 0190-292X
Publisher: Policy Studies Organization
Language: English
Submitter: Manuel Fischer
Date Deposited: 24 Nov 2016 16:59
Last Modified: 30 Nov 2016 19:27
Publisher DOI: 10.1111/psj.12173
Uncontrolled Keywords: Fracking, Advocacy Coalition Framework
BORIS DOI: 10.7892/boris.88317
URI: http://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/88317

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback