Neonatal Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight and Very Preterm Neonates: An International Comparison.

Shah, Prakesh S; Lui, Kei; Sjörs, Gunnar; Mirea, Lucia; Reichman, Brian; Adams, Mark; Modi, Neena; Darlow, Brian A; Kusuda, Satoshi; San Feliciano, Laura; Yang, Junmin; Håkansson, Stellan; Mori, Rintaro; Bassler, Dirk; Figueras-Aloy, Josep; Lee, Shoo K; International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of Neonates, iNeo (2016). Neonatal Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight and Very Preterm Neonates: An International Comparison. Journal of pediatrics, 177, 144-152.e6. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.04.083

Text 1-s2.0-S0022347616301937-main.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (410kB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVE

To compare rates of a composite outcome of mortality or major morbidity in very-preterm/very low birth weight infants between 8 members of the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

We included 58 004 infants born weighing <1500 g at 24(0)-31(6) weeks' gestation from databases in Australia/New Zealand, Canada, Israel, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. We compared a composite outcome (mortality or any of grade ≥3 peri-intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular echodensity/echolucency, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or treated retinopathy of prematurity) between each country and all others by using standardized ratios and pairwise using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Despite differences in population coverage, included neonates were similar at baseline. Composite outcome rates varied from 26% to 42%. The overall mortality rate before discharge was 10% (range: 5% [Japan]-17% [Spain]). The standardized ratio (99% CIs) estimates for the composite outcome were significantly greater for Spain 1.09 (1.04-1.14) and the United Kingdom 1.16 (1.11-1.21), lower for Australia/New Zealand 0.93 (0.89-0.97), Japan 0.89 (0.86-0.93), Sweden 0.81 (0.73-0.90), and Switzerland 0.77 (0.69-0.87), and nonsignificant for Canada 1.04 (0.99-1.09) and Israel 1.00 (0.93-1.07). The adjusted odds of the composite outcome varied significantly in pairwise comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified marked variations in neonatal outcomes between countries. Further collaboration and exploration is needed to reduce variations in population coverage, data collection, and case definitions. The goal would be to identify care practices and health care organizational factors, which has the potential to improve neonatal outcomes.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

3 since deposited on 24 May 2017
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item