Sculier, Delphine; Gayet-Ageron, Angèle; Battegay, Manuel; Cavassini, Matthias; Fehr, Jan; Hirzel, Cédric; Schmid, Patrick; Bernasconi, Enos; Calmy, Alexandra (2017). Rilpivirine use in the Swiss HIV cohort study: a prospective cohort study. BMC infectious diseases, 17(1), p. 476. BioMed Central 10.1186/s12879-017-2579-2
|
Text
s12879-017-2579-2.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (628kB) | Preview |
BACKGROUND
Rilpivirine is safe and effective in HIV-naïve patients with low baseline HIV-RNA or in switch strategy. It offers the advantages of few drug-drug interactions and a favourable toxicity profile. We aimed to determine the reasons for prescribing the rilpivirine (RPV)/tenofovir disoproxil (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) co-formulation within the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and to assess its effectiveness and safety over a 24 months period.
METHODS
All individuals enrolled in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study who initiated a RPV/TDF/FTC co-formulation between April 2013 and March 2014 were included. Primary outcomes were the HIV-RNA viral load (copies/mL) and CD4 cell count (cells/mm(3)) at 6, 12 and 24 months. Reasons for a switch to RPV/TDF/FTC were evaluated through a standardized questionnaire. We also assessed discontinuation and reasons for discontinuation of RPV/TDF/FTC until October 30, 2015.
RESULTS
Of 644 individuals who started the RPV/TDF/FTC co-formulation, only 7.5% were treatment-naïve. At 24 months, viral suppression (HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL) was achieved in 100% and 96.7% of cART-naïve and cART-experienced patients respectively. The switch to RPV was mainly done for simplification (44.6%) and to overcome central nervous system toxicity symptoms due to efavirenz (24%). Six months after switch, 74.8% of patients reported an improvement of psycho-neurological symptoms with continued improvement at 12 months for almost 80%. However, one quarter of patients reported a discontinuation of RPV/TDF/FTC on October 30, 2015 after a median time of 18.4 months. Reasons for discontinuation included physician decision (5.3%) and side-effects (3.9%) mainly related to the central nervous system and to renal toxicity.
CONCLUSION
The RPV/TDF/FTC co-formulation was safe and effective throughout 24 months of follow-up but barely prescribed for HIV-naïve patients. Despite excellent virological suppression among both treatment-naïve and -experienced patients, we observed a high rate of treatment discontinuation.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Haematology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Laboratory Medicine and Hospital Pharmacy (DOLS) > Clinic of Infectiology |
UniBE Contributor: |
Hirzel, Cédric |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
1471-2334 |
Publisher: |
BioMed Central |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Annelies Luginbühl |
Date Deposited: |
25 Oct 2017 16:34 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:06 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1186/s12879-017-2579-2 |
PubMed ID: |
28683720 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
First-line regimen HIV-1 Rilpivirine Safety Treatment simplification Virological response |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.101882 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/101882 |