Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.

Reardon, Michael J; Van Mieghem, Nicolas M; Popma, Jeffrey J; Kleiman, Neal S; Søndergaard, Lars; Mumtaz, Mubashir; Adams, David H; Deeb, G Michael; Maini, Brijeshwar; Gada, Hemal; Chetcuti, Stanley; Gleason, Thomas; Heiser, John; Lange, Rüdiger; Merhi, William; Oh, Jae K; Olsen, Peter S; Piazza, Nicolo; Williams, Mathew; Windecker, Stephan; ... (2017). Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. New England journal of medicine NEJM, 376(14), pp. 1321-1331. Massachusetts Medical Society MMS 10.1056/NEJMoa1700456

[img]
Preview
Text
NEJMoa1700456.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (346kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND Although transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) is an accepted alternative to surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high surgical risk, less is known about comparative outcomes among patients with aortic stenosis who are at intermediate surgical risk. METHODS We evaluated the clinical outcomes in intermediate-risk patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis in a randomized trial comparing TAVR (performed with the use of a self-expanding prosthesis) with surgical aortic-valve replacement. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or disabling stroke at 24 months in patients undergoing attempted aortic-valve replacement. We used Bayesian analytical methods (with a margin of 0.07) to evaluate the noninferiority of TAVR as compared with surgical valve replacement. RESULTS A total of 1746 patients underwent randomization at 87 centers. Of these patients, 1660 underwent an attempted TAVR or surgical procedure. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 79.8±6.2 years, and all were at intermediate risk for surgery (Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality, 4.5±1.6%). At 24 months, the estimated incidence of the primary end point was 12.6% in the TAVR group and 14.0% in the surgery group (95% credible interval [Bayesian analysis] for difference, -5.2 to 2.3%; posterior probability of noninferiority, >0.999). Surgery was associated with higher rates of acute kidney injury, atrial fibrillation, and transfusion requirements, whereas TAVR had higher rates of residual aortic regurgitation and need for pacemaker implantation. TAVR resulted in lower mean gradients and larger aortic-valve areas than surgery. Structural valve deterioration at 24 months did not occur in either group. CONCLUSIONS TAVR was a noninferior alternative to surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis at intermediate surgical risk, with a different pattern of adverse events associated with each procedure. (Funded by Medtronic; SURTAVI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01586910 .).

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Cardiovascular Disorders (DHGE) > Clinic of Cardiology

UniBE Contributor:

Windecker, Stephan

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0028-4793

Publisher:

Massachusetts Medical Society MMS

Language:

English

Submitter:

Daniela Huber

Date Deposited:

07 Dec 2017 07:45

Last Modified:

22 Oct 2019 18:57

Publisher DOI:

10.1056/NEJMoa1700456

PubMed ID:

28304219

Additional Information:

Tätigkeit von Prof. Carrel in Forschungsgruppe

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.107675

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/107675

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback