Neoadjuvant treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: The past, the present, and the future.

Hermans, Tom J N; Voskuilen, Charlotte S; van der Heijden, Michiel S; Schmitz-Dräger, Bernd J; Kassouf, Wassim; Seiler, Roland; Kamat, Ashish M; Grivas, Petros; Kiltie, Anne E; Black, Peter C; van Rhijn, Bas W G (2018). Neoadjuvant treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: The past, the present, and the future. Urologic oncology - seminars and original investigations, 36(9), pp. 413-422. Elsevier 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.014

Text Seiler_UrolOncol_Neoadjuvant treatment.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (1MB)

BACKGROUND

Approximately half of patients who undergo radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) will succumb to metastatic disease. We summarize the evidence for neoadjuvant radiation (NAR), chemo (NAC), and immunotherapy (checkpoint inhibition) prior to RC for MIBC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were obtained by a search of PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases for English language articles published from 1925 up to 2017.

RESULTS

NAC usage has increased over the last decade, while NAR is rarely administered. Although NAR results in downstaging, its impact on survival is inconclusive. Based on level I evidence, cisplatin-based NAC (CB-NAC) is considered standard of care in cT2-4aN0M0 MIBC. NAC results in a 6% absolute 10-year overall survival (OS) benefit. In-depth analyses of key randomized controlled trials showed that failure to correct for uniform staging, surgical variation, and patient selection compromises the ability to identify factors predictive of response to NAC. The benefit appears to be restricted to patients downstaged to ypT1N0 or less. In these patients, 5-year OS is 80% to 90%. Regarding a number needed to treat of 17, most patients with cT2-4aN0M0 MIBC will be exposed to toxicity without benefit. Possible approaches to reduce overtreatment are suggested in this article and include patient selection, the chosen NAC regimen, and emerging molecular data to predict responsiveness to NAC. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is a promising future perspective currently under investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Past studies on NAR show inconclusive results and NAR is rarely administered. Instead, CB-NAC is advised in eligible patients with cT2-4aN0M0 MIBC prior to RC. In the near future, predictive biomarkers will be the key to tailor the use of CB-NAC and reduce harm to nonresponders.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

2 since deposited on 30 Jan 2018
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item