Compliance with removable orthodontic appliances and adjuncts: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Al-Moghrabi, D; Salazar, FC; Pandis, Nikolaos; Fleming, PS (2017). Compliance with removable orthodontic appliances and adjuncts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 152(1), pp. 17-32. Elsevier 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.019

[img] Text
1-s2.0-S0889540617303323-main.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

INTRODUCTION: The primary aims of this systematic review were to assess objective levels of wear of removable orthodontic appliances and components vs both stipulated and self-reported levels. We also aimed to consider patient experiences and the effectiveness of interventions geared at enhancing compliance. METHODS: Electronic databases and reference lists of relevant studies were searched with no language restriction (PROSPERO: CRD42016036059). Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, case series, qualitative and mixed-methods studies objectively assessing compliance levels were identified. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool, risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I), or mixed-methods appraisal tool based on their design. RESULTS: Of 4269 records, 80 full texts were obtained, with 24 studies meeting the selection criteria. Of these, 11 were included in the quantitative synthesis. A weighted estimate of objectively assessed compliance levels in relation to stipulated wear time was calculated with the discrepancy highest in the headgear group (5.81 hours per day, 95% confidence interval, 4.98, 6.64) based on 6 studies. The mean discrepancy between self-reported and objectively assessed headgear wear was 5.02 hours per day (95% confidence interval, 3.64, 6.40). Compliance level was not directly related to appliance type (P = 0.211). Thematic synthesis was not undertaken because of the limited number of qualitative studies. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with removable orthodontic appliances and adjuncts is suboptimal, and patients routinely overestimate duration of wear. Techniques for improving compliance have promise but require further evaluation in high-level research.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Orthodontics

UniBE Contributor:

Pandis, Nikolaos

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0889-5406

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Renate Imhof-Etter

Date Deposited:

26 Jan 2018 14:43

Last Modified:

26 Jan 2018 14:51

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.019

PubMed ID:

28651764

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.110039

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/110039

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback