Low flow veno-venous extracorporeal CO2 removal for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Hilty, Matthias P; Riva, Thomas; Cottini, Silvia R; Kleinert, Eva-Maria; Maggiorini, Alessandra; Maggiorini, Marco (2017). Low flow veno-venous extracorporeal CO2 removal for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Minerva anestesiologica, 83(8), pp. 812-823. Minerva Medica 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11524-5

[img] Text
Thomas Riva_Lowflow_Minerva_2017.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (767kB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND Ventilation with low tidal volume and airway pressure results in a survival benefit in ARDS patients. Previous research suggests that avoiding mechanical ventilation altogether may be beneficial in some cases of respiratory failure. Our hypothesis was that low flow veno-venous extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) enables maintenance of a lung protective ventilation strategy or awake spontaneous ventilation despite severe hypercapnic respiratory failure (HRF). METHODS Twenty patients with HRF were investigated while mechanically ventilated (N.=14) or breathing spontaneously close to respiratory exhaustion (N.=6). Low flow ECCO2R was performed using a hemoperfusion device with a polypropylene gas-exchanger. RESULTS Causes of HRF were severe ARDS (N.=11), COPD (N.=4), chronic lung transplant rejection (N.=3) and cystic fibrosis (N.=2). During the first 8h of ECCO2R, PaCO2 decreased from 10.6 (9.3-12.9) to 7.9 (7.3-9.3) kPa (P<0.001) and pH increased from 7.23 (7.09-7.40) to 7.36 (7.27-7.41) (P<0.05). Thereafter, steady state was achieved while maintaining lung protective tidal volume (4.7 (3.8-6.5) mL/kg) and peak ventilator pressure (28 (27-30) mbar at 24 h). During the first 48 h, thrombocyte count decreased by 52% (P<0.01), Fibrinogen by 38% (P<0.05). Intubation could be avoided in all spontaneously breathing patients. In 4/6 high blood flow extracorporeal circulation was required due to increased oxygen demand. 6/14 mechanically ventilated patients recovered from respiratory support. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that in mechanically ventilated patients with HRF, low flow ECCO2R supports the maintenance of lung protective tidal volume and peak ventilator pressure. In selected awake patients with acute HRF, it may be a novel treatment approach to avoid mechanical ventilation, hence preventing ventilator- and sedation-associated morbidity and mortality.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic and Policlinic for Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy

UniBE Contributor:

Riva, Thomas

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0375-9393

Publisher:

Minerva Medica

Language:

English

Submitter:

Jeannie Wurz

Date Deposited:

19 Mar 2018 12:15

Last Modified:

19 Mar 2018 12:15

Publisher DOI:

10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11524-5

PubMed ID:

28275225

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.110468

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/110468

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback