Outcomes from the Delphi process of the Thoracic Robotic Curriculum Development Committee.

Dorn, Patrick; Veronesi, Giulia; Dunning, Joel; Cardillo, Giuseppe; Schmid, Ralph; Collins, Justin; Baste, Jean-Marc; Limmer, Stefan; Shahin, Ghada M M; Egberts, Jan-Hendrik; Pardolesi, Alessandro; Meacci, Elisa; Stamenkovic, Sasha; Casali, Gianluca; Rueckert, Jens C; Taurchini, Mauro; Santelmo, Nicola; Melfi, Franca; Toker, Alper (2018). Outcomes from the Delphi process of the Thoracic Robotic Curriculum Development Committee. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 53(6), pp. 1173-1179. Oxford University Press 10.1093/ejcts/ezx466

[img] Text
Outcomes from the Delphi process of the Thoracic Robotic Curriculum Development Committee.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only until 26 January 2021.
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (548kB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVES As the adoption of robotic procedures becomes more widespread, additional risk related to the learning curve can be expected. This article reports the results of a Delphi process to define procedures to optimize robotic training of thoracic surgeons and to promote safe performance of established robotic interventions as, for example, lung cancer and thymoma surgery. METHODS In June 2016, a working panel was spontaneously created by members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) with a specialist interest in robotic thoracic surgery and/or surgical training. An e-consensus-finding exercise using the Delphi methodology was applied requiring 80% agreement to reach consensus on each question. Repeated iterations of anonymous voting continued over 3 rounds. RESULTS Agreement was reached on many points: a standardized robotic training curriculum for robotic thoracic surgery should be divided into clearly defined sections as a staged learning pathway; the basic robotic curriculum should include a baseline evaluation, an e-learning module, a simulation-based training (including virtual reality simulation, Dry lab and Wet lab) and a robotic theatre (bedside) observation. Advanced robotic training should include e-learning on index procedures (right upper lobe) with video demonstration, access to video library of robotic procedures, simulation training, modular console training to index procedure, transition to full-procedure training with a proctor and final evaluation of the submitted video to certified independent examiners. CONCLUSIONS Agreement was reached on a large number of questions to optimize and standardize training and education of thoracic surgeons in robotic activity. The production of the content of the learning material is ongoing.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > BioMedical Research (DBMR) > Forschungsbereich Mu50 > Forschungsgruppe Thoraxchirurgie
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Gastro-intestinal, Liver and Lung Disorders (DMLL) > Clinic of Thoracic Surgery

UniBE Contributor:

Dorn, Patrick and Schmid, Ralph

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1010-7940

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Language:

English

Submitter:

Thomas Michael Marti

Date Deposited:

09 Apr 2018 14:38

Last Modified:

07 Nov 2019 06:19

Publisher DOI:

10.1093/ejcts/ezx466

PubMed ID:

29377988

Additional Information:

The first two authors (Giulia Veronesi, Patrick Dorn) contributed equally.

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Consensus Curriculum Robotic Thoracic surgery Training

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.110513

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/110513

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback