Effect of Post-Dilatation Following Primary PCI With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation: An Angiographic and Optical Coherence Tomography TROFI II Substudy.

Yamaji, Kyohei; Brugaletta, Salvatore; Sabaté, Manel; Iñiguez, Andrés; Jensen, Lisette Okkels; Cequier, Angel; Hofma, Sjoerd H; Christiansen, Evald Høj; Suttorp, Maarten; van Es, Gerrit Anne; Sotomi, Yohei; Onuma, Yoshinobu; Serruys, Patrick W; Windecker, Stephan; Räber, Lorenz (2017). Effect of Post-Dilatation Following Primary PCI With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation: An Angiographic and Optical Coherence Tomography TROFI II Substudy. JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions, 10(18), pp. 1867-1877. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.035

[img] Text
1-s2.0-S1936879817316126-main.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (977kB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the effect of post-dilatation on angiographic and intracoronary imaging parameters in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention comparing the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) with the everolimus-eluting metallic stent (EES). BACKGROUND Routine post-dilatation of BRS has been suggested to improve post-procedural angiographic and subsequent device-related clinical outcomes. METHODS In the ABSORB STEMI TROFI II trial, 191 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to treatment with BRS (n = 95) or EES (n = 96). Minimal lumen area and healing score as assessed by optical coherence tomography at 6 months were compared between BRS- and EES-treated patients stratified according to post-dilatation status. RESULTS Primary percutaneous coronary intervention with post-dilatation was performed in 48 (50.5%) BRS- and 25 (25.5%) EES-treated lesions. There were no differences in baseline characteristics and post-procedural minimal lumen diameter between groups. In the BRS group, lesions with post-dilatation were associated with a trend toward a smaller minimal lumen area at 6 months (5.07 ± 1.68 mm2 vs. 5.72 ± 1.77 mm2; p = 0.09) and significantly larger angiographic late lumen loss (0.28 ± 0.34 mm vs. 0.12 ± 0.25 mm; p = 0.02), whereas no difference was observed in the EES arm (5.46 ± 2.18 mm2 vs. 5.55 ± 1.77 mm2; p = 0.85). The neointimal healing score was low and comparable between groups with and without post-dilation (BRS: 1.55 ± 2.61 vs. 1.92 ± 2.17; p = 0.48; EES: 2.50 ± 3.33 vs. 2.90 ± 4.80; p = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS In the setting of selected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with BRS or EES, post-dilatation did not translate into larger lumen area or improved arterial healing at follow-up. (ABSORB STEMI: The TROFI II; NCT01986803).

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Cardiovascular Disorders (DHGE) > Clinic of Cardiology

UniBE Contributor:

Yamaji, Kyohei; Windecker, Stephan and Räber, Lorenz

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1876-7605

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Nadia Biscozzo

Date Deposited:

08 Feb 2018 15:37

Last Modified:

20 Nov 2019 07:24

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.035

PubMed ID:

28935079

Uncontrolled Keywords:

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction bioresorbable vascular scaffold optical coherence tomography percutaneous coronary intervention

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.111062

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/111062

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback