Comparative efficacy and acceptability of pharmacological treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.

Cipriani, Andrea; Williams, Taryn; Nikolakopoulou, Adriani; Salanti, Georgia; Chaimani, Anna; Ipser, Jonathan; Cowen, Phil J; Geddes, John R; Stein, Dan J (2018). Comparative efficacy and acceptability of pharmacological treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis. Psychological medicine, 48(12), pp. 1975-1984. Cambridge University Press 10.1017/S003329171700349X

[img] Text
Cipriani PsycholMed 2018.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only until 20 December 2022.
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (846kB) | Request a copy
[img]
Preview
Text
Cipriani PsycholMed 2018_postprint.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (2MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND Guidelines about post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) recommend broad categories of drugs, but uncertainty remains about what pharmacological treatment to select among all available compounds. METHODS Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials register, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, National PTSD Center Pilots database, PubMed, trial registries, and databases of pharmaceutical companies were searched until February 2016 for double-blind randomised trials comparing any pharmacological intervention or placebo as oral therapy in adults with PTSD. Initially, we performed standard pairwise meta-analyses using a random effects model. We then carried out a network meta-analysis. The main outcome measures were mean change on a standardised scale and all-cause dropout rate. Acute treatment was defined as 8-week follow up. RESULTS Desipramine, fluoxetine, paroxetine, phenelzine, risperidone, sertraline, and venlafaxine were more effective than placebo; phenelzine was better than many other active treatments and was the only drug, which was significantly better than placebo in terms of dropouts (odds ratio 7.50, 95% CI 1.72-32.80). Mirtazapine yielded a relatively high rank for efficacy, but the respective value for acceptability was not among the best treatments. Divalproex had overall the worst ranking. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy and acceptability hierarchies generated by our study were robust against many sources of bias. The differences between drugs and placebo were small, with the only exception of phenelzine. Considering the small amount of available data, these results are probably not robust enough to suggest phenelzine as a drug of choice. However, findings from this review reinforce the idea that phenelzine should be prioritised in future trials in PTSD.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)

UniBE Contributor:

Nikolakopoulou, Adriani and Salanti, Georgia

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

0033-2917

Publisher:

Cambridge University Press

Language:

English

Submitter:

Tanya Karrer

Date Deposited:

15 Feb 2018 14:42

Last Modified:

23 Oct 2019 03:14

Publisher DOI:

10.1017/S003329171700349X

PubMed ID:

29254516

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Network meta-analysis post-traumatic stress disorder systematic review

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.111381

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/111381

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback