Differences in coronary plaque characteristics between patients with and those without peripheral arterial disease.

Bryniarski, Krzysztof L; Yamamoto, Erika; Takumi, Higuma; Xing, Lei; Zanchin, Thomas; Sugiyama, Tomoyo; Lee, Hang; Jang, Ik-Kyung (2017). Differences in coronary plaque characteristics between patients with and those without peripheral arterial disease. Coronary artery disease, 28(8), pp. 658-663. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000531

[img]
Preview
Text
00019501-201712000-00007.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (182kB) | Preview

INTRODUCTION Cardiovascular mortality of patients with combined peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) is twice as high as that in those with either disease alone. It is known that patients with PAD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention have a higher incidence of adverse cardiac events such as myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization. OBJECTIVE In this study, we compared the detailed characteristics of culprit and nonculprit plaques between patients with and those without PAD using optical coherence tomography. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed propensity score matching using the following variables: (i) age; (ii) sex; (iii) clinical presentation; (iv) diabetes mellitus; (v) hyperlipidemia; (vi) smoking; (vii) hypertension; (viii) BMI; and (ix) coronary lesion location. Finally, we matched 34 culprit lesions and 30 nonculprit lesions in patients with PAD to 68 culprit lesions and 60 nonculprit lesions in patients without PAD (1 : 2 ratio). RESULTS In culprit lesions, PAD patients when compared with those without PAD had a higher prevalence of lipid-rich plaque (73.5 vs. 51.5%; P=0.033), higher lipid index (1744±1110 vs. 1246±656; P=0.043), calcification (79.4 vs. 58.8%; P=0.039), macrophage accumulation (70.6 vs. 48.5%; P=0.034), and cholesterol crystals (32.4 vs. 10.3%; P=0.006). In nonculprit lesions, PAD patients had a higher prevalence of calcification (76.7 vs. 55.0%; P=0.046), macrophage accumulation (63.3 vs. 38.3%; P=0.025), and cholesterol crystals (36.7 vs. 16.7%; P=0.034). CONCLUSION Our study suggests greater coronary plaque vulnerability in both culprit and nonculprit lesions in patients with PAD. This observation underscores the need for more aggressive risk management in patients with combined PAD and coronary artery disease.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Graduate School:

Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences (GCB)

ISSN:

0954-6928

Publisher:

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Language:

English

Submitter:

Marlene Wolf Tobler

Date Deposited:

16 May 2018 08:16

Last Modified:

22 Oct 2019 21:00

Publisher DOI:

10.1097/MCA.0000000000000531

PubMed ID:

28692481

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.112541

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/112541

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback