Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange for oxygenation of children during apnoea: a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Riva, Thomas; Pedersen, Tina Heidi; Seiler, Stefan Jürg; Kasper, Nina Elisabeth; Theiler, Lorenz; Greif, Robert; Kleine-Brüggeney, Maren (2018). Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange for oxygenation of children during apnoea: a prospective randomised controlled trial. British journal of anaesthesia, 120(3), pp. 592-599. Elsevier 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.017

[img] Text
PIIS0007091217542063.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (515kB)

BACKGROUND

Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) comprises the administration of heated, humidified, and blended air/oxygen mixtures via nasal cannula at rates of ≥2 litres kg min. The aim of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate the length of the safe apnoea time using THRIVE with two different oxygen concentrations (100% vs 30% oxygen) compared with standard low-flow 100% oxygen administration.

METHODS

Sixty patients, aged 1-6 yr, weighing 10-20 kg, undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery, were randomly allocated to receive one of the following oxygen administration methods during apnoea: 1) low-flow 100% oxygen at 0.2 litres kg min; 2) THRIVE 100% oxygen at 2 litres kg min; and 3) THRIVE 30% oxygen at 2 litres kg min. Primary outcome was time to desaturation to 95%. Termination criteria included SpOdecreased to 95%, transcutaneous COincreased to 65 mmHg, or apnoea time of 10 min.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) [range] apnoea time was 6.9 (5.7-7.8) [2.8-10.0] min for low-flow 100% oxygen, 7.6 (6.2-9.1) [5.2-10.0] min for THRIVE 100% oxygen, and 3.0 (2.4-3.7) [0.2-5.3] min for THRIVE 30% oxygen. No significant difference was detected between apnoea times with low-flow and THRIVE 100% oxygen administration (P=0.15). THRIVE with 30% oxygen demonstrated significantly shorter apnoea times (P<0.001) than both 100% oxygen modalities. The overall rate of transcutaneous COincrease was 0.57 (0.49-0.63) [0.29-8.92] kPa minwithout differences between the 3 groups (P=0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

High-flow 100% oxygen (2 litres kg min) administered via nasal cannulas did not extend the safe apnoea time for children weighing 10-20 kg compared with low-flow nasal cannula oxygen (0.2 litres kg min). No ventilatory effect was observed with THRIVE at 2.0 litres kg min.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02979067.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic and Policlinic for Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy

UniBE Contributor:

Riva, Thomas, Pedersen, Tina Heidi, Seiler, Stefan Jürg, Kasper, Nina Elisabeth, Theiler, Lorenz, Greif, Robert, Kleine-Brüggeney, Maren

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0007-0912

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Jeannie Wurz

Date Deposited:

22 Mar 2018 08:38

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 15:11

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.017

PubMed ID:

29452816

Uncontrolled Keywords:

THRIVE apnoeic oxygenation high-flow nasal cannula oxygen paediatric anaesthesia safe apnoea time

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.112644

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/112644

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback