Self-learning basic life support: A randomised controlled trial on learning conditions.

Pedersen, Tina Heidi; Kasper, Nina Elisabeth; Hari, Roman; Egloff, Mike; Marx, David; Abegglen, Sandra; Greif, Robert (2018). Self-learning basic life support: A randomised controlled trial on learning conditions. Resuscitation, 126, pp. 147-153. Elsevier Science Ireland 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.02.031

Text Self-learning basic life support A randomised controlled trial on learning conditions Resuscitation 2018.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (504kB)

AIM OF THE STUDY

To investigate whether pure self-learning without instructor support, resulted in the same BLS-competencies as facilitator-led learning, when using the same commercially available video BLS teaching kit.

METHODS

First-year medical students were randomised to either BLS self-learning without supervision or facilitator-led BLS-teaching. Both groups used the MiniAnne kit (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway) in the students' local language. Directly after the teaching and three months later, all participants were tested on their BLS-competencies in a simulated scenario, using the Resusci Anne SkillReporter™ (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway). The primary outcome was percentage of correct cardiac compressions three months after the teaching. Secondary outcomes were all other BLS parameters recorded by the SkillReporter and parameters from a BLS-competence rating form.

RESULTS

240 students were assessed at baseline and 152 students participated in the 3-month follow-up. For our primary outcome, the percentage of correct compressions, we found a median of 48% (interquartile range (IQR) 10-83) for facilitator-led learning vs. 42% (IQR 14-81) for self-learning (p = 0.770) directly after the teaching. In the 3-month follow-up, the rate of correct compressions dropped to 28% (IQR 6-59) for facilitator-led learning (p = 0.043) and did not change significantly in the self-learning group (47% (IQR 12-78), p = 0.729).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-learning is not inferior to facilitator-led learning in the short term. Self-learning resulted in a better retention of BLS-skills three months after training compared to facilitator-led training.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

5 since deposited on 25 Apr 2018
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item