Small study effects in meta-analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta-epidemiological study

Nüesch, Eveline; Trelle, Sven; Reichenbach, Stephan; Rutjes, Anne W S; Tschannen, Beatrice; Altman, Douglas G; Egger, Matthias; Jüni, Peter (2010). Small study effects in meta-analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ, 341(c3515), c3515. London: BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/bmj.c3515

[img]
Preview
Text
Nüesch BMJ 2010.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

Download (189kB) | Preview

Objective To examine the presence and extent of small study effects in clinical osteoarthritis research. Design Meta-epidemiological study. Data sources 13 meta-analyses including 153 randomised trials (41 605 patients) that compared therapeutic interventions with placebo or non-intervention control in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee and used patients’ reported pain as an outcome. Methods We compared estimated benefits of treatment between large trials (at least 100 patients per arm) and small trials, explored funnel plots supplemented with lines of predicted effects and contours of significance, and used three approaches to estimate treatment effects: meta-analyses including all trials irrespective of sample size, meta-analyses restricted to large trials, and treatment effects predicted for large trials. Results On average, treatment effects were more beneficial in small than in large trials (difference in effect sizes −0.21, 95% confidence interval −0.34 to −0.08, P=0.001). Depending on criteria used, six to eight funnel plots indicated small study effects. In six of 13 meta-analyses, the overall pooled estimate suggested a clinically relevant, significant benefit of treatment, whereas analyses restricted to large trials and predicted effects in large trials yielded smaller non-significant estimates. Conclusions Small study effects can often distort results of meta-analyses. The influence of small trials on estimated treatment effects should be routinely assessed.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine

UniBE Contributor:

Nüesch, Eveline; Trelle, Sven; Reichenbach, Stephan; Rutjes, Anne; Tschannen, Beatrice; Egger, Matthias and Jüni, Peter

ISSN:

1756-1833

Publisher:

BMJ Publishing Group

Language:

English

Submitter:

Factscience Import

Date Deposited:

04 Oct 2013 14:09

Last Modified:

30 Oct 2016 01:39

Publisher DOI:

10.1136/bmj.c3515

PubMed ID:

20639294

Web of Science ID:

000280157000002

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.1145

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/1145 (FactScience: 201951)

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback