Assessing the assessments: evaluation of four impact assessment protocols for invasive alien species

Turbé, A; Strubbe, DE; Mori, E; Carrete, M; Chiron, F; Clergeau, P; González-Moreno, P; Le Louarn, M; Luna, A; Mattia, Menchetti; Nentwig, Wolfgang; Pârâu, LG; Postigo, JL; Rabitsch, W; Senar, JC; Tollington, S; Vanderhoeven, S; Weiserbs, A; Shwartz, A (2017). Assessing the assessments: evaluation of four impact assessment protocols for invasive alien species. Diversity & distributions, 23(3), pp. 297-307. Wiley-Blackwell 10.1111/ddi.12528

[img] Text
Turb-_et_al-2017-Diversity_and_Distributions.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (500kB) | Request a copy

Aim Effective policy and management responses to the multiple threats posed by invasive alien species (IAS) rely on the ability to assess their impacts before conclusive empirical evidence is available. A plethora of different IAS risk and/or impact assessment protocols have been proposed, but it remains unclear whether, how and why the outcomes of such assessment protocols may differ. Location Europe. Methods Here, we present an in-depth evaluation and informed assessment ofthe consistency of four prominent protocols for assessing IAS impacts (EICAT,GISS, Harmonia+ and NNRA), using two non-native parrots in Europe: thewidespread ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri) and the rapidly spreading monk parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus). Results Our findings show that the procedures used to assess impacts may influence assessment outcomes. We find that robust IAS prioritization can be obtained by assessing species based on their most severe documented impacts,as all protocols yield consistent outcomes across impact categories. Additive impact scoring offers complementary, more subtle information that may be especially relevant for guiding management decisions regarding already established invasive alien species. Such management decisions will also strongly benefit from consensus approaches that reduce disagreement between experts,fostering the uptake of scientific advice into policy-making decisions. Main conclusions Invasive alien species assessments should take advantage of the capacity of consensus assessments to consolidate discussion and agreement between experts. Our results suggest that decision-makers could use the assessment protocol most fit for their purpose, on the condition they apply a precautionary approach by considering the most severe impacts only. We also recommend that screening for high-impact IAS should be performed on a more robust basis than current ad hoc practices, at least using the easiest assessment protocols and reporting confidence scores. Keywords biological invasions, confidence, consensus assessment, invasive alien species,invasive species policy, monk parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus), ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri).

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

08 Faculty of Science > Department of Biology > Institute of Ecology and Evolution (IEE)

UniBE Contributor:

Nentwig, Wolfgang

Subjects:

500 Science > 570 Life sciences; biology

ISSN:

1366-9516

Publisher:

Wiley-Blackwell

Language:

English

Submitter:

Alexander Strauss

Date Deposited:

15 Jun 2018 10:20

Last Modified:

24 Oct 2019 22:52

Publisher DOI:

10.1111/ddi.12528

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.116162

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/116162

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback