Homophily and prestige: An assessment of their relative strength to explain link formation in the online climate change debate

Schmid-Petri, Hannah; Adam, Silke; Reber, Ueli; Häussler, Thomas; Maier, Daniel; Miltner, Peter; Pfetsch, Barbara; Waldherr, Annie (2018). Homophily and prestige: An assessment of their relative strength to explain link formation in the online climate change debate. Social networks, 55, pp. 47-54. Elsevier 10.1016/j.socnet.2018.05.001

	Text Schmid-Petri et al_2018_Homophily and prestige.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (755kB) | Request a copy
Preview	Text Homophily_prestige_final version.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (424kB) | Preview

Previous work has shown that hyperlinks reflect actors’ strategic choices; these dyadic relationships depend on the actors’ exogenous attributes (e.g., homophily) and the network’s endogenous features (e.g., prestige distribution among actors). We combine these factors as explanatory variables in different exponential random graph models (ERGMs) to assess the relative strength of prestige and homophily for the actors’ link formation. We analyze the climate change discourse in a hyperlink network formed by US civil society actors from November 2014 and test how relevant the different factors are, including variables such as actor type, country, position, and topic. We find that both prestige and various aspects of homophily influence link formation online. With regard to the importance of the different factors, positional homophily stands out, followed by prestige and other homophily effects.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

218 since deposited on 24 May 2018
28 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item