Expectancies influence attention to neutral but not necessarily to threatening stimuli: An fMRI study

Aue, Tatjana; Guex, Raphaël; Chauvigné, Léa A. S.; Okon-Singer, Hadas; Vuilleumier, Patrik (2019). Expectancies influence attention to neutral but not necessarily to threatening stimuli: An fMRI study. Emotion, 19(7), pp. 1244-1258. American Psychological Association 10.1037/emo0000496

[img]
Preview
Text
AueEtAl_InPress_Emotion.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.
© 2018, American Psychological Association. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the final, authoritative version of the article. Please do not copy or cite without authors' permission. The final article will be available, upon publication, via its DOI: 10.1037/emo0000496

Download (1MB) | Preview

Recent behavioral observations suggest an influence of prior expectancies on attention to neutral targets, while the detection of threatening targets remains comparably immune to these expectancies. The origin of this asymmetry, however, remains unclear. Here, therefore, we investigated its neural basis by using fMRI. Specifically, we tested whether, in accordance with the idea of a resetting attentional system during phylogenetic threat detection, neural responses for threatening compared with neutral targets would remain largely unaffected by prior expectancies. Alternatively, neural responses could reflect equally strong expectancy influences on both types of targets, with the respective patterns differing, thereby producing the asymmetric effect observed in behavior. Predictive cues in our study evoked specific behavioral and neural expectancy states and effectively modulated response latencies to detect neutral (bird) targets in a 3 × 3 visual search matrix: When threat-related (spider) rather than neutral targets were expected, bird detection was considerably slowed, and the neural response to expected birds differed from that to unexpected birds. Conversely, and in line with the hypothesis of a resetting attentional system for phylogenetic threat, expectancy cues had no impact on reaction times or neural responses for spider targets – either in spider phobics or in non-spider-fearful controls. Our data support the idea of bottom-up enhancement of threat-related information through processing pathways unaffected by top-down modulatory influences such as expectancy. These pathways may subserve rapid and comparably automatic responding to threat stimuli by safeguarding independence from more controlled and explicit expectancies, consequently promoting adaptive behavior and survival.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

07 Faculty of Human Sciences > Institute of Psychology > Psychological and Behavioral Health

UniBE Contributor:

Aue, Tatjana

Subjects:

100 Philosophy > 150 Psychology
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1528-3542

Publisher:

American Psychological Association

Funders:

[4] Swiss National Science Foundation

Language:

English

Submitter:

Tatjana Aue

Date Deposited:

11 Jul 2018 15:30

Last Modified:

22 Oct 2019 22:35

Publisher DOI:

10.1037/emo0000496

Uncontrolled Keywords:

expectancy bias, attention bias, combined bias hypothesis, fear, phobia, biological preparedness, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.118253

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/118253

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback