Gender inequity in the provision of care for hip disease: population-based cross-sectional study

Jüni, P; Low, N; Reichenbach, S; Villiger, P M; Williams, S; Dieppe, P A (2010). Gender inequity in the provision of care for hip disease: population-based cross-sectional study. Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 18(5), pp. 640-645. Amsterdam: Elsevier 10.1016/j.joca.2009.12.010

[img] Text
Jüni OsteoarthrCartil 2010.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (275kB) | Request a copy

Objectives

To examine gender differences along the care pathway to total hip replacement.

Methods

We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of 26,046 individuals aged 35 years and over in Avon and Somerset. Participants completed a questionnaire asking about care provision at five milestones on the pathway to total hip replacement. Those reporting hip disease were invited to a clinical examination. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) [95% confidence intervals (CI)] for provision of care to women compared with men.

Results

3169 people reported hip pain, 2018 were invited for clinical examination, and 1405 attended (69.6%). After adjustment for age and disease severity, women were less likely than men to have consulted their general practitioner (OR 0.78, 95%-CI 0.61–1.00), as likely as men to have received drug therapy for hip pain in the previous year (OR 0.96, 95%-CI 0.74–1.24), but less likely to have been referred to specialist care (OR 0.53, 95%-CI 0.40–0.70), to have consulted an orthopaedic surgeon (OR 0.50, 95%-CI 0.32–0.78), or to be on a waiting list for total hip replacement (OR 0.41, 95%-CI 0.20–0.87). Differences remained in the 746 people who had sought care from their general practitioner, and after adjustment for willingness and fitness for surgery.

Conclusions

There are gender inequalities in provision of care for hip disease in England, which are not fully accounted for by gender differences in care seeking and treatment preferences. Differences in referral to specialist care by general practitioners might unwittingly contribute to this inequity. Accurate information about availability, benefits and risks of hip replacement for providers and patients, and continuing education to ensure that clinicians interpret and correct patients' assumptions could help reduce inequalities.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Dermatology, Urology, Rheumatology, Nephrology, Osteoporosis (DURN) > Clinic of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergology

UniBE Contributor:

Jüni, Peter; Low, Nicola; Reichenbach, Stephan and Villiger, Peter

ISSN:

1063-4584

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Factscience Import

Date Deposited:

04 Oct 2013 14:09

Last Modified:

18 Aug 2015 15:04

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.joca.2009.12.010

PubMed ID:

20167302

Web of Science ID:

000278175600007

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.1186

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/1186 (FactScience: 202150)

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback