Oncology nurses' beliefs and attitudes towards the double-check of chemotherapy medications: a cross-sectional survey study.

Schwappach, D L B; Taxis, Katja; Pfeiffer, Yvonne (2018). Oncology nurses' beliefs and attitudes towards the double-check of chemotherapy medications: a cross-sectional survey study. BMC health services research, 18(1), p. 123. BioMed Central 10.1186/s12913-018-2937-9

[img]
Preview
Text
Schwappach BMCHealthServRes 2018.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (351kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Double-checking medications is a widely used strategy to enhance safe medication administration in oncology, but there is little evidence to support its effectiveness. The proliferated use of double-checking may be explained by positive attitudes towards checking among nurses. This study investigated oncology nurses' beliefs towards double-checking medication, its relation to beliefs about safety and the influence of nurses' level of experience and proximity to clinical care.

METHODS

This was a survey of all oncology nurses in three Swiss hospitals. The questionnaire contained 41 items on 6 domains. Responses were recorded using a 7-point Likert scale. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify factors linked to strong beliefs in the effectiveness of double-checking.

RESULTS

Overall, 274 (70%) out of 389 nurses responded (91% female, mean age 37 (standard deviation = 10)). Nurses reported very strong beliefs in the effectiveness and utility of double-checking. They were also confident about their own performance in double-checking. Nurses widely believed that double checking produced safety (e.g., 86% believed errors of individuals could be intercepted with double-checks). In contrast, some limitations of double-checking were also recognized, e.g., 33% of nurses reported that double checking caused frequent interruptions and 28% reported that double-checking was done superficially in their unit. Regression analysis revealed that beliefs in effectiveness of double-checking were mainly associated with beliefs in safety production (p < 0.001). Nurses with experience in barcode scanning held less strong beliefs in effectiveness of double-checking (p = 0.006). In contrast to our expectations, there were no differences in beliefs between any professional sub-groups.

CONCLUSION

The widespread and strong believe in the effectiveness of double-checking is linked to beliefs about safety production and co-exists with acknowledgement of the major disadvantages of double-checking by humans. These results are important factors to consider when any existing procedures are adapted or new checking procedures are implemented.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)

UniBE Contributor:

Schwappach, David

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

1472-6963

Publisher:

BioMed Central

Language:

English

Submitter:

Tanya Karrer

Date Deposited:

28 Aug 2018 14:13

Last Modified:

23 Oct 2019 02:31

Publisher DOI:

10.1186/s12913-018-2937-9

PubMed ID:

29454347

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Double-check Medication errors Oncology Patient safety Survey

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.119535

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/119535

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback