Taking the „Just“ Decision. Caseworkers and Their Communities of Interpretation in the Swiss Asylum Office

Affolter, Laura; Miaz, Jonathan; Poertner, Ephraim (2019). Taking the „Just“ Decision. Caseworkers and Their Communities of Interpretation in the Swiss Asylum Office. In: Gill, Nick; Good, Anthony (eds.) Asylum Determination in Europe: Ethnographic Perspectives. Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies (pp. 263-284). Palgrave Macmillan 10.1007/978-3-319-94749-5_13

Preview

Text Affolter2019_Chapter_TakingTheJustDecisionCaseworke.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (264kB) | Preview

Decision-making in street-level bureaucracies has often been portrayed as being riddled with a practical dilemma: that of having to juggle between compassion and rigid rule-following. However, drawing on three ethnographic studies of Swiss asylum administration, we argue that often what are from the ‘outside’ perceived as conflicting rationales of decision-making, are not experienced as such by the caseworkers themselves. Rather these different rationales are made to fit. We argue that decision-makers’ ‘volitional allegiance’ with the office plays a crucial role thereby. For the caseworkers we encountered, decision-making is about taking ‘just decisions’, i.e. decisions that they consider ‘correct’ and ‘fair’. We suggest that these notions of correctness and fairness are crucially influenced by their affiliations and allegiances with different ‘communities of interpretation’ within the office.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

144 since deposited on 01 Oct 2018
24 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item