Konar, M.; Lang, Johann (2011). Pros and cons of low-field magnetic resonance imaging in veterinary practice. Veterinary radiology & ultrasound, 52(1 Suppl 1), S5-S14. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2010.01780.x
![[img]](https://boris.unibe.ch/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Konar_2011.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
Low-field (LF) (0.2-0.4T) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging predominates in veterinary practice. Advantages of LF MR include reduced costs, better patient access, and greater safety. High quality examinations can be achieved using appropriate protocols and investing more scanning time than with high-field (HF) systems. The main disadvantage of LF MR is the reduced signal to noise ratio compared with HF systems. LF MR protocols for small animal brain and spine imaging are described.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine (DKV) > DKV - Clinical Radiology 05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine (DKV) |
UniBE Contributor: |
Lang-Fritz, Johann |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 630 Agriculture |
ISSN: |
1058-8183 |
Publisher: |
Blackwell |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Factscience Import |
Date Deposited: |
04 Oct 2013 14:31 |
Last Modified: |
02 Mar 2023 23:21 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1111/j.1740-8261.2010.01780.x |
Web of Science ID: |
000288167400003 |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.12068 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/12068 (FactScience: 218346) |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |