Different Types and Acceptability of Psychotherapies for Acute Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents: A Network Meta-analysis.

Zhou, Xinyu; Zhang, Yuqing; Furukawa, Toshiaki A; Cuijpers, Pim; Pu, Juncai; Weisz, John R; Yang, Lining; Hetrick, Sarah E; Del Giovane, Cinzia; Cohen, David; James, Anthony C; Yuan, Shuai; Whittington, Craig; Jiang, Xiaofeng; Teng, Teng; Cipriani, Andrea; Xie, Peng (2019). Different Types and Acceptability of Psychotherapies for Acute Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents: A Network Meta-analysis. JAMA psychiatry, 76(1), pp. 41-50. American Medical Association 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3070

[img] Text
Zhou JAMAPsychiatry 2019.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (522kB) | Request a copy

Importance Anxiety disorders are common in children and adolescents, and uncertainty remains regarding the optimal strategy of psychotherapies in this population. Objective To compare and rank the different types of psychotherapies and the different ways of delivering psychological treatments for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Data Sources PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), ProQuest Dissertations, LILACS (Literatura Latino Americana em Ciências da Saúde), international trial registers, and US Food and Drug Administration reports were searched from inception to November 30, 2017. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials that compared any structured psychotherapy with another psychotherapy or a control condition for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents were selected. Data Extraction and Synthesis Four researchers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. Pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian network meta-analysis within the random-effects model were used to synthesize data. Main Outcomes and Measures Efficacy (change in anxiety symptoms) posttreatment and at follow-up, acceptability (all-cause discontinuation), and quality of life and functional improvement were measured. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Results A total of 101 unique trials including 6625 unique participants compared 11 different psychotherapies with 4 specific control conditions. The certainty of evidence was rated as low or very low for most comparisons. For efficacy, most psychotherapies were significantly more effective than the wait list condition posttreatment (standardized mean difference [SMD], -1.43 to -0.61) and at the longest follow-up (SMD, -1.84 to -1.64). However, only group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was significantly more effective than the other psychotherapies and all control conditions posttreatment. For acceptability, bibliotherapy CBT had significantly more all-cause discontinuations than some psychotherapies and control conditions (range of odds ratios, 2.48-9.32). In terms of quality of life and functional improvement, CBT (delivered in different ways) was significantly beneficial compared with psychological placebo and the wait list condition (SMDs, 0.73 to 1.99). Conclusions and Relevance Group CBT would be the more appropriate choice of psychotherapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents, based on these findings. Other types of psychotherapies and different ways of delivering psychological treatment can be alternative options. Further research is needed to explore specific anxiety disorders, disorder-specific psychotherapy, and moderators of treatment effect. Trial Registration PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42015016283.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Medical Education > Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)

UniBE Contributor:

Del Giovane, Cinzia

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

2168-622X

Publisher:

American Medical Association

Language:

English

Submitter:

Doris Kopp Heim

Date Deposited:

20 Nov 2018 14:25

Last Modified:

22 Oct 2019 19:45

Publisher DOI:

10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3070

PubMed ID:

30383099

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.121383

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/121383

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback