Prognostic function to estimate the probability of meaningful clinical improvement after surgery - Results of a prospective multicenter observational cohort study on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Held, Ulrike; Burgstaller, Jakob M; Wertli, Maria M.; Pichierri, Giuseppe; Winklhofer, Sebastian; Brunner, Florian; Porchet, François; Farshad, Mazda; Steurer, Johann (2018). Prognostic function to estimate the probability of meaningful clinical improvement after surgery - Results of a prospective multicenter observational cohort study on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. PLoS ONE, 13(11), e0207126. Public Library of Science 10.1371/journal.pone.0207126

Preview

Text Held-2018-Prognostic function to estimate the.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

Approximately two thirds of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) who undergo surgical treatment benefit from the surgery. The objective of this study was to derive a prognostic probability function (PPF) to identify patients with a high probability of post-surgical improvement because there is currently no method available.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective, observational study, we collected data from eight medical centers in Switzerland in which patients underwent surgery for LSS. The endpoints were meaningful clinically important differences (MCID) in pain and disability one year after baseline. We developed a PPF named PROCESS (PostopeRative OutComE Spinal Stenosis), based on a large set of prognostic indicators extracted from the literature. The PPF was derived using data from a random subset of two thirds of the patients and validated in the remaining third. We addressed overfitting by shrinking the regression coefficients. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) and calibration determined the accuracy of the PPF.

RESULTS

In this study, 452 LSS patients received surgery. 73% of the 300 patients in the derivation subset reached an MCID in pain and 68% reached an MCID in disability. The corresponding values were 70% and 63% in the validation subset, respectively. In the derivation subsample, the AUC was 0.64 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.71) for of the PPF predicting MCID in pain and 0.71 (0.64 to 0.77) for MCID in disability, after shrinkage. The corresponding numbers were 0.62 (0.52 to 0.72) and 0.70 (0.60 to 0.79) in the validation subsample, and the PPF showed good calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is being performed with increasing frequency. PROCESS is conditional on the individual pattern of preoperatively available prognostic indicators, and may be helpful for clinicians in counselling patients and in guiding the discussion on individual treatment decision in the era of personalized medicine.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

161 since deposited on 09 Jan 2019
16 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item