Naci, Huseyin; Salcher-Konrad, Maximilian; Dias, Sofia; Blum, Manuel; Sahoo, Samali Anova; Nunan, David; Ioannidis, John P A (2019). How does exercise treatment compare with antihypertensive medications? A network meta-analysis of 391 randomised controlled trials assessing exercise and medication effects on systolic blood pressure. British journal of sports medicine, 53(14), pp. 859-869. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099921
Text
bjsports-2018-099921.full.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (596kB) |
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effect of exercise regimens and medications on systolic blood pressure (SBP).
DATA SOURCES
Medline (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), angiotensin-2 receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and diuretics were identified from existing Cochrane reviews. A previously published meta-analysis of exercise interventions was updated to identify recent RCTs that tested the SBP-lowering effects of endurance, dynamic resistance, isometric resistance, and combined endurance and resistance exercise interventions (up to September 2018).
DESIGN
Random-effects network meta-analysis.
OUTCOME
Difference in mean change from baseline SBP between comparator treatments (change from baseline in one group minus that in the other group) and its 95% credible interval (95% CrI), measured in mmHg.
RESULTS
We included a total of 391 RCTs, 197 of which evaluated exercise interventions (10 461 participants) and 194 evaluated antihypertensive medications (29 281 participants). No RCTs compared directly exercise against medications. While all medication trials included hypertensive populations, only 56 exercise trials included hypertensive participants (≥140 mmHg), corresponding to 3508 individuals. In a 10% random sample, risk of bias was higher in exercise RCTs, primarily due to lack of blinding and incomplete outcome data. In analyses that combined all populations, antihypertensive medications achieved higher reductions in baseline SBP compared with exercise interventions (mean difference -3.96 mmHg, 95% CrI -5.02 to -2.91). Compared with control, all types of exercise (including combination of endurance and resistance) and all classes of antihypertensive medications were effective in lowering baseline SBP. Among hypertensive populations, there were no detectable differences in the SBP-lowering effects of ACE-I, ARB, β-blocker and diuretic medications when compared with endurance or dynamic resistance exercise. There was no detectable inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons. Although there was evidence of small-study effects, this affected both medication and exercise trials.
CONCLUSIONS
The effect of exercise interventions on SBP remains under-studied, especially among hypertensive populations. Our findings confirm modest but consistent reductions in SBP in many studied exercise interventions across all populations but individuals receiving medications generally achieved greater reductions than those following structured exercise regimens. Assuming equally reliable estimates, the SBP-lowering effect of exercise among hypertensive populations appears similar to that of commonly used antihypertensive medications. Generalisability of these findings to real-world clinical settings should be further evaluated.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of General Internal Medicine (DAIM) > Clinic of General Internal Medicine |
UniBE Contributor: |
Blum, Manuel |
Subjects: |
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health |
ISSN: |
0306-3674 |
Publisher: |
BMJ Publishing Group |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Tobias Tritschler |
Date Deposited: |
19 Feb 2019 08:21 |
Last Modified: |
05 Dec 2022 15:24 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1136/bjsports-2018-099921 |
PubMed ID: |
30563873 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
evaluation exercise |
BORIS DOI: |
10.7892/boris.123189 |
URI: |
https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/123189 |