Examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale in 20 diverse samples: Support for use of a total score and six subscale scores

Neff, Kristin D.; Tóth-Király, István; Yarnell, Lisa M.; Arimitsu, Kohki; Castilho, Paula; Ghorbani, Nima; Guo, Hailan Xiaoxia; Hirsch, Jameson K.; Hupfeld, Jörg; Hutz, Claudio S.; Kotsou, Ilios; Lee, Woo Kyeong; Montero-Marin, Jesus; Sirois, Fuschia M.; de Souza, Luciana K.; Svendsen, Julie L.; Wilkinson, Ross B.; Mantzios, Michail (2019). Examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale in 20 diverse samples: Support for use of a total score and six subscale scores. Psychological assessment, 31(1), pp. 27-45. American Psychological Association 10.1037/pas0000629

[img] Text
Neff Toth Kiraly et al 2019.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (248kB) | Request a copy

This study examined the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) using secondary data drawn from 20 samples (N = 11,685)—7 English and 13 non-English—including 10 community, 6 student, 1 mixed community/student, 1 meditator, and 2 clinical samples. Self-compassion is theorized to represent a system with 6 constituent components: self-kindness, common humanity, mindfulness and reduced self-judgment, isolation and overidentification. There has been controversy as to whether a total score on the SCS or if separate scores representing compassionate versus uncompassionate self-responding should be used. The current study examined the factor structure of the SCS using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) to examine 5 distinct models: 1-factor, 2-factor correlated, 6-factor correlated, single-bifactor (1 general self-compassion factor and 6 group factors), and 2-bifactor models (2 correlated general factors each with 3 group factors representing compassionate or uncompassionate self-responding). Results indicated that a 1- and 2-factor solution to the SCS had inadequate fit in every sample examined using both CFA and ESEM, whereas fit was excellent using ESEM for the 6-factor correlated, single-bifactor and correlated 2-bifactor models. However, factor loadings for the correlated 2-bifactor models indicated that 2 separate factors were not well specified. A general factor explained 95% of the reliable item variance in the single-bifactor model. Results support use of the SCS to examine 6 subscale scores (representing the constituent components of self-compassion) or a total score (representing overall self-compassion), but not separate scores representing compassionate and uncompassionate self-responding.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

07 Faculty of Human Sciences > Institute of Psychology > Social Psychology and Social Neuroscience
07 Faculty of Human Sciences > Institute of Psychology

UniBE Contributor:

Hupfeld, Jörg

Subjects:

300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology
100 Philosophy > 150 Psychology

ISSN:

1040-3590

Publisher:

American Psychological Association

Language:

English

Submitter:

Jörg Hupfeld Heinemann

Date Deposited:

14 Feb 2019 08:13

Last Modified:

16 Nov 2019 08:54

Publisher DOI:

10.1037/pas0000629

PubMed ID:

30124303

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.123946

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/123946

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback