Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: Patient-reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry.

Feine, Jocelyne; Abou-Ayash, Samir; Al Mardini, Majd; de Santana, Ronaldo Barcelllos; Bjelke-Holtermann, Trine; Bornstein, Michael M.; Brägger, Urs; Cao, Olivia; Cordaro, Luca; Eycken, Didier; Fillion, Mathieu; Gebran, Georges; Huynh-Ba, Guy; Joda, Tim Alexander; Levine, Robert; Mattheos, Nikos; Oates, Thomas W; Abd-Ul-Salam, Hani; Santosa, Robert; Shahdad, Shakeel; ... (2018). Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: Patient-reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry. Clinical oral implants research, 29(S16), pp. 270-275. Wiley-Blackwell 10.1111/clr.13299

[img]
Preview
Text
Feine_et_al-2018-Clinical_Oral_Implants_Research.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

Download (482kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES The aim of Working Group 3 was to focus on three topics that were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). These topics included the following: (a) the aesthetics of tooth and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses focusing on partially edentulous patients, (b) a comparison of fixed and removable implant-retained prostheses for edentulous populations, and (c) immediate versus early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentate patients. PROMs include ratings of satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (QHRQoL), as well as other indicators, that is, pain, general health-related quality of life (e.g., SF-36). MATERIALS AND METHODS The Consensus Conference Group 3 participants discussed the findings of the three systematic review manuscripts. Following comprehensive discussions, participants developed consensus statements and recommendations that were then discussed in larger plenary sessions. Following this, any necessary modifications were made and approved. RESULTS Patients were very satisfied with the aesthetics of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and the surrounding mucosa. Implant neck design, restorative material, or use of a provisional restoration did not influence patients' ratings. Edentulous patients highly rate both removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses. However, they rate their ability to maintain their oral hygiene significantly higher with the removable prosthesis. Both immediate provisionalization and conventional loading receive positive patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Patient-reported outcome measures should be gathered in every clinical study in which the outcomes of oral rehabilitation with dental implants are investigated. PROMs, such as patients' satisfaction and QHRQoL, should supplement other clinical parameters in our clinical definition of success.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology

UniBE Contributor:

Abou-Ayash, Samir; Brägger, Urs; Joda, Tim Alexander and Wittneben, Julia

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0905-7161

Publisher:

Wiley-Blackwell

Language:

English

Submitter:

Vanda Kummer

Date Deposited:

19 Mar 2019 15:10

Last Modified:

24 Oct 2019 08:24

Publisher DOI:

10.1111/clr.13299

PubMed ID:

30328187

Uncontrolled Keywords:

clinical research clinical trials patient-centered outcomes prosthodontics systematic reviews

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.124463

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/124463

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback