Timing of anticoagulation after recent ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation

Seiffge, D. J.; Werring, D. J.; Paciaroni, M.; Dawson, J.; Warach, S.; Milling, T. J.; Engelter, S. T.; Fischer, Urs; Norrving, B. (2019). Timing of anticoagulation after recent ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Lancet neurology, 18(1), pp. 117-126. Elsevier 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30356-9

[img] Text
1-s2.0-S1474442218303569-main.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (997kB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND: About 13-26 of all acute ischaemic strokes are related to non-valvular atrial fibrillation, the most common cardiac arrhythmia globally. Deciding when to initiate oral anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation is a longstanding, common, and unresolved clinical challenge. Although the risk of early recurrent ischaemic stroke is high in this population, early oral anticoagulation is suspected to increase the risk of potentially harmful intracranial haemorrhage, including haemorrhagic transformation of the infarct. This assumption, and current treatment guidelines, are based on historical, mostly observational data from patients with ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation treated with heparins, heparinoids, or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to prevent recurrent ischaemic stroke. Randomised controlled trials have subsequently shown that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; ie, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) are at least as effective as VKAs in primary and secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation-related ischaemic stroke, with around half the risk of intracranial haemorrhage. However, none of these DOAC trials included patients who had experienced ischaemic stroke recently (within the first few weeks). Clinicians therefore remain uncertain regarding when to commence DOAC administration after acute ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: Prospective observational studies and two small randomised trials have investigated the risks and benefits of early DOAC-administration initiation (most with a median delay of 3-5 days) in mild-to-moderate atrial fibrillation-associated ischaemic stroke. These studies reported that early DOAC treatment was associated with a low frequency of clinically symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage or surrogate haemorrhagic lesions on MRI scans, whereas later DOAC-administration initiation (ie, >7 days or >14 days after index stroke) was associated with an increased frequency of recurrent ischaemic stroke. WHERE NEXT?: Adequately powered randomised controlled trials comparing early to later oral anticoagulation with DOACs in ischaemic stroke associated with atrial fibrillation are justified to confirm the acceptable safety and efficacy of this strategy. Four such randomised controlled trials (collectively planned to include around 9000 participants) are underway, either using single cutoff timepoints for early versus late DOAC-administration initiation, or selecting DOAC-administration timing according to the severity and imaging features of the ischaemic stroke. The results of these trials should help to establish the optimal timing to initiate DOAC administration after recent ischaemic stroke and whether the timing should differ according to stroke severity. Results of these trials are expected from 2021.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Head Organs and Neurology (DKNS) > Clinic of Neurology

UniBE Contributor:

Fischer, Urs

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1474-4422

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Panagiota Milona

Date Deposited:

31 Jan 2019 17:28

Last Modified:

21 Nov 2019 04:23

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30356-9

PubMed ID:

30415934

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.124775

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/124775

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback