Supportive peri-implant therapy following anti-infective surgical peri-implantitis treatment: 5-year survival and success.

Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa J A; Salvi, Giovanni Edoardo; Mombelli, Andrea; Loup, Pierre-Jean; Heitz, Fritz; Kruger, Estie; Lang, Niklaus Peter (2018). Supportive peri-implant therapy following anti-infective surgical peri-implantitis treatment: 5-year survival and success. Clinical oral implants research, 29(1), pp. 1-6. Wiley-Blackwell 10.1111/clr.12910

[img] Text
Heitz-Mayfield_et_al-2018-Clinical_Oral_Implants_Research.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (294kB) | Request a copy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate clinical outcomes of supportive peri-implant therapy (SPIT) following surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four partially dentate patients with 36 dental implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis were treated by an anti-infective surgical protocol followed by regular supportive therapy. SPIT included removal of supra- and submucosal biofilm at the treated implants using titanium or carbon fibre curettes, or ultrasonic devices. In addition, professional prophylaxis (calculus/biofilm removal) at other implants/teeth and oral hygiene reinforcement was provided. Clinical measurements and radiographs were obtained at 1, 3 and 5 years. A successful treatment outcome was defined as implant survival with the absence of peri-implant probing depths (PD) ≥ 5 mm with concomitant bleeding/suppuration and absence of progression of peri-implant bone loss.

RESULTS

Twelve months after treatment, there was 100% survival of the treated implants and 79% of patients (19 of 24) had a successful treatment outcome according to the defined success criteria. At 3 years, 75% of the patients (18 of 24) had a successful treatment outcome, two patients (8%) were lost to follow-up (LTF), while 8% lost an implant, and two patients had recurrence of peri-implantitis. Between 3 and 5 years, an additional two patients were LTF, and an additional two patients each lost one implant. Thus, at 5 years 63% of patients (15 of 24) had a successful treatment outcome. Complete resolution of peri-implantitis, defined as absence of bleeding at all sites, was achieved in 42% of implants (N = 15) at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Five years following regular supportive therapy, the peri-implant conditions established following peri-implantitis surgery were maintained in the majority of patients and implants. Some patients had recurrence of peri-implantitis and some lost implants over the 5-year period.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Periodontology

UniBE Contributor:

Salvi, Giovanni Edoardo, Lang, Niklaus Peter

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0905-7161

Publisher:

Wiley-Blackwell

Language:

English

Submitter:

Doris Burri

Date Deposited:

03 Jul 2019 11:21

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 15:25

Publisher DOI:

10.1111/clr.12910

PubMed ID:

27335316

Uncontrolled Keywords:

maintenance care peri-implantitis success supportive therapy survival

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.125340

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/125340

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback