Eye spots do not increase altruism in children

Vogt, Sonja; Efferson, Charles; Berger, Joël; Fehr, Ernst (2015). Eye spots do not increase altruism in children. Evolution and human behavior, 36(3), pp. 224-231. Elsevier 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.11.007

[img] Text
Eye spots do not increase altruism in children.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (276kB) | Request a copy

The evolutionary legacy hypothesis proposes that an evolved reciprocity-based psychology affects human behavior in anonymous one-shot interactions when reciprocity is not explicitly possible. Empirical support rests on experiments showing that altruism among adults increases in the presence of stylized eye spots or faces. Such stimuli do not affect material payoffs, but they are assumed to activate a person’s reciprocity-based psychology. We identify two versions of the evolutionary legacy hypothesis. The weak hypothesis posits that reputational concerns can generate altruism in the absence of opportunities for a good reputation. The strong hypothesis posits that reputational concerns alone can explain anonymous one-shot altruism, and they can do so specifically in lieu of explanations based on group selection. A number of experimental studies support the weak hypothesis but are merely consistent with the strong hypothesis. To address both the weak and strong hypotheses, we conducted an eye spot experiment with children. Altruism can vary by age or sex in childhood, and under the strong hypothesis this kind of variation should reveal associated variation in sensitivity to eye spots. Although we found significant variation in altruism among children, we found no corresponding variation in sensitivity to eye spots. More generally, we found no eye spot effects of any kind. We discuss the possibility that eye spots might only affect altruism under specific conditions. We further argue that conditional effects do not refute the weak hypothesis in any way, but they do suggest potential limitations on the explanatory scope of the strong hypothesis.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

03 Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Institute of Sociology

UniBE Contributor:

Vogt, Sonja Brigitte

Subjects:

300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology

ISSN:

1090-5138

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Simona Richard

Date Deposited:

06 Aug 2019 14:27

Last Modified:

22 Oct 2019 18:08

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.11.007

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.128487

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/128487

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback