Do fish get wasted? Assessing the influence of effluents on parasitic infection of wild fish.

Bailey, Christyn John; Rubin, Aurélie; Strepparava, Nicole; Segner, Helmut; Rubin, Jean-François; Wahli, Thomas (2018). Do fish get wasted? Assessing the influence of effluents on parasitic infection of wild fish. PeerJ, 6, e5956. PeerJ, Ltd 10.7717/peerj.5956

[img]
Preview
Text
peerj-5956.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (12MB) | Preview

Many ecosystems are influenced simultaneously by multiple stressors. One important environmental stressor is aquatic pollution via wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents. WWTP effluents may contribute to eutrophication or contain anthropogenic contaminants that directly and/or indirectly influence aquatic wildlife. Both eutrophication and exposure to anthropogenic contaminants may affect the dynamics of fish-parasite systems. With this in mind, we studied the impact of WWTP effluents on infection of brown trout by the parasite , the causative agent of proliferative kidney disease (PKD). PKD is associated with the long-term decline of wild brown trout () populations in Switzerland. We investigated PKD infection of brown trout at two adjacent sites (≈400 m apart) of a Swiss river. The sites are similar in terms of ecology except that one site receives WWTP effluents. We evaluated the hypothesis that fish inhabiting the effluent site will show greater susceptibility to PKD in terms of prevalence and disease outcome. We assessed susceptibility by (i) infection prevalence, (ii) parasite intensity, (iii) host health in terms of pathology, and (iv) estimated apparent survival rate. At different time points during the study, significant differences between sites concerning all measured parameters were found, thus providing evidence of the influence of effluents on parasitic infection of fish in our study system. However, from these findings we cannot determine if the effluent has a direct influence on the fish host via altering its ability to manage the parasite, or indirectly on the parasite or the invertebrate host via increasing bryozoa (the invertebrate host) reproduction. On a final note, the WWTP adhered to all national guidelines and the effluent only resulted in a minor water quality reduction assessed via standardized methods in this study. Thus, we provide evidence that even a subtle decrease in water quality, resulting in small-scale pollution can have consequences for wildlife.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Infectious Diseases and Pathobiology (DIP)
05 Veterinary Medicine > Department of Infectious Diseases and Pathobiology (DIP) > Center for Fish and Wildlife Health (FIWI)

UniBE Contributor:

Bailey, Christyn John; Strepparava, Nicole; Segner, Helmut and Wahli, Thomas

Subjects:

600 Technology > 630 Agriculture
500 Science > 570 Life sciences; biology

ISSN:

2167-8359

Publisher:

PeerJ, Ltd

Language:

English

Submitter:

Achim Braun Parham

Date Deposited:

05 Jun 2019 10:49

Last Modified:

09 Jun 2019 02:41

Publisher DOI:

10.7717/peerj.5956

PubMed ID:

30479904

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Aquatic pollution Host-parasite interactions Multiple stressors PKD Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae Wastewater Wild fish

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.129638

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/129638

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback