An inspection of Preferred Argument Structure in Mapudungun narratives

Matter, Florian (2020). An inspection of Preferred Argument Structure in Mapudungun narratives. International journal of American linguistics, 86(1), pp. 59-93. University of Chicago Press 10.1086/705754

[img] Text - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (260kB) | Request a copy

The surface form of arguments in natural discourse, theoretically freely chosen, is by no means arbitrary. Clear tendencies emerge when analyzing stretches of discourse. One such pattern concerns the different proportions of lexically realized arguments in A, as opposed to S and P, and has been explained by Du Bois through a set of underlying principles. The pattern has more recently been suggested to be an epiphenomenal effect of animacy. In this paper, I analyze a corpus of Mapudungun narratives and investigate the form and information status of 4,218 references. The results show S between A and P in its lexicality, and a discord with constraints constituting PAS. There is also an unexpectedly high proportion of lexical human S arguments, independent of information status. Not only do these findings contribute to the growing body of evidence suggesting that PAS is flawed and that animacy should not be neglected, they also suggest that animacy alone does not explain all patterns. In addition, they promote an independent treatment of information status and formal expression in this kind of corpus study.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)


06 Faculty of Humanities > Department of Linguistics and Literary Studies > Institute of Linguistics

UniBE Contributor:

Matter, Florian


400 Language > 410 Linguistics




University of Chicago Press




Florian Emmanuel Matter

Date Deposited:

25 Jun 2019 14:11

Last Modified:

14 Feb 2020 11:23

Publisher DOI:





Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback