Defining ranges for certainty ratings of diagnostic accuracy: A GRADE concept paper.

Hultcrantz, Monica; Mustafa, Reem A; Leeflang, Mariska M G; Lavergne, Valéry; Estrada-Orozco, Kelly; Ansari, Mohammed T; Izcovich, Ariel; Singh, Jasvinder; Chong, Lee Yee; Rutjes, Anne; Steingart, Karen; Stein, Airton; Sekercioglu, Nigar; Rodriguez, Ingrid Arévalo; Morgan, Rebecca L; Guyatt, Gordon; Bossuyt, Patrick; Langendam, Miranda W; Schünemann, Holger J (2020). Defining ranges for certainty ratings of diagnostic accuracy: A GRADE concept paper. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 117, pp. 138-148. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.002

Preview	Text Hultcrantz JClinEpidemiol 2019_postprint.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (914kB) | Preview
Preview	Text Hultcrantz JClinEpidemiol 2020.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND). Download (598kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVE

To clarify how the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) concept of certainty of evidence applies to certainty ratings of test accuracy.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

After initial brainstorming with GRADE Working Group members, we iteratively refined and clarified the approaches for defining ranges when assessing the certainty of evidence for test accuracy within a systematic review, health technology assessment, or guidelines.

RESULTS

Ranges can be defined both for single test accuracy and for comparative accuracy of multiple tests. For systematics reviews and health technology assessments, approaches for defining ranges include some that do not require value judgments regarding downstream health outcomes. Key challenges arise in the context of a guideline that requires ranges for sensitivity and specificity that are set considering possible effects on all critical outcomes. We illustrate possible approaches and provide an example from a systematic review of a direct comparison between two test strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

This GRADE concept paper provides a framework for assessing, presenting, and making decisions based on the certainty of evidence for test accuracy. More empirical research is needed to support future GRADE guidance on how to best operationalize the candidate approaches.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

229 since deposited on 23 May 2019
27 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item