Defining ranges for certainty ratings of diagnostic accuracy: A GRADE concept paper.

Hultcrantz, Monica; Mustafa, Reem A; Leeflang, Mariska M G; Lavergne, Valéry; Estrada-Orozco, Kelly; Ansari, Mohammed T; Izcovich, Ariel; Singh, Jasvinder; Chong, Lee Yee; Rutjes, Anne; Steingart, Karen; Stein, Airton; Sekercioglu, Nigar; Rodriguez, Ingrid Arévalo; Morgan, Rebecca L; Guyatt, Gordon; Bossuyt, Patrick; Langendam, Miranda W; Schünemann, Holger J (2020). Defining ranges for certainty ratings of diagnostic accuracy: A GRADE concept paper. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 117, pp. 138-148. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.002

[img]
Preview
Text
Hultcrantz JClinEpidemiol 2019_postprint.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (914kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
Hultcrantz JClinEpidemiol 2020.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND).

Download (598kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVE To clarify how the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) concept of certainty of evidence applies to certainty ratings of test accuracy. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING After initial brainstorming with GRADE Working Group members, we iteratively refined and clarified the approaches for defining ranges when assessing the certainty of evidence for test accuracy within a systematic review, health technology assessment, or guidelines. RESULTS Ranges can be defined both for single test accuracy and for comparative accuracy of multiple tests. For systematics reviews and health technology assessments, approaches for defining ranges include some that do not require value judgments regarding downstream health outcomes. Key challenges arise in the context of a guideline that requires ranges for sensitivity and specificity that are set considering possible effects on all critical outcomes. We illustrate possible approaches and provide an example from a systematic review of a direct comparison between two test strategies. CONCLUSIONS This GRADE concept paper provides a framework for assessing, presenting, and making decisions based on the certainty of evidence for test accuracy. More empirical research is needed to support future GRADE guidance on how to best operationalize the candidate approaches.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)

UniBE Contributor:

Rutjes, Anne

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

0895-4356

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Doris Kopp Heim

Date Deposited:

23 May 2019 15:08

Last Modified:

19 May 2020 02:30

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.002

PubMed ID:

31112801

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Certainty of evidence GRADE Guidelines Health technology assessments Systematic reviews test accuracy

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.130807

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/130807

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback