Effectiveness and clinical performance of early implant placement for the replacement of single teeth in anterior areas: A systematic review.

Graziani, Filippo; Chappuis, Vivianne; Molina, Ana; Lazarin, Rafael; Schmid, Eric; Chen, Stephen; Salvi, Giovanni Edoardo (2019). Effectiveness and clinical performance of early implant placement for the replacement of single teeth in anterior areas: A systematic review. Journal of clinical periodontology, 46(Suppl 21), pp. 242-256. Wiley 10.1111/jcpe.13092

[img] Text
Graziani_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Clinical_Periodontology.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (596kB) | Request a copy

AIM

To assess the effectiveness and clinical performance of early implant placement, 4-8 (Type 2) or 12-16 weeks (Type 3) after extraction, in single anterior sites.

METHODS

Studies reporting on Type 2 and Type 3 implant placement were identified. Findings were summarized in evidence tables. Main outcome was implant survival. Peri-implant soft and hard tissues changes, periodontal parameters, aesthetics and patient-reported outcomes were also evaluated. Quality of reporting of the included studies was evaluated through Consort, Newcastle-Ottawa scale and IHE quality appraisal checklist.

RESULTS

Nineteen eligible articles (seven from one RCT, three from two CCTs and nine from three case series) reporting on 140 patients and 140 implants were included. Type 3 implants showed comparable results to Type 4: 95% vs. 100% survival rates. Studies reported high values of implant survival, minimal technical and biological complications and high aesthetic scores in both short and long-term follow-ups for both Type 2 and Type 3 implant placement. Quality evaluation highlighted important weaknesses in the included trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited data on Type 2 and Type 3 implant placement appear to indicate that they can perform well both short and long term. However, the limited number of cases, the significant heterogeneity of the included studies and the high risk of biases importantly reduce the generalizability of the findings. CRD42018117363.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Periodontology
04 Faculty of Medicine > School of Dental Medicine > Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology

UniBE Contributor:

Chappuis, Vivianne, Lazarin, Rafael, Schmid, Eric, Salvi, Giovanni Edoardo

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

0303-6979

Publisher:

Wiley

Language:

English

Submitter:

Caroline Balz

Date Deposited:

31 Jul 2019 08:49

Last Modified:

05 Dec 2022 15:29

Publisher DOI:

10.1111/jcpe.13092

PubMed ID:

30821840

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Endosseous implant aesthetics complications guided bone regeneration patient-reported outcome measures tooth extraction

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.131625

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/131625

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback