Factors associated with patients' and GPs' assessment of the burden of treatment in multimorbid patients: a cross-sectional study in primary care.

Herzig, Lilli; Zeller, Andreas; Pasquier, Jérôme; Streit, Sven; Neuner-Jehle, Stefan; Excoffier, Sophie; Haller, Dagmar M (2019). Factors associated with patients' and GPs' assessment of the burden of treatment in multimorbid patients: a cross-sectional study in primary care. BMC family practice, 20(1), p. 88. BioMed Central 10.1186/s12875-019-0974-z

[img]
Preview
Text
Herzig BMC Fam Pract 2019.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (764kB) | Preview

BACKGROUND Multimorbid patients may experience a high burden of treatment. This has a negative impact on treatment adherence, health outcomes and health care costs. The objective of our study was to identify factors associated with the self-perceived burden of treatment of multimorbid patients in primary care and to compare them with factors associated with GPs assessment of this burden. METHOD A cross sectional study in general practices, 100 GPs in Switzerland and up to 10 multimorbid patients per GP. Patients reported their self-perceived burden of treatment using the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ, possible score 0-150), whereas GPs evaluated the burden of treatment on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 1 to 9. The study explored medical, social and psychological factors associated with burden of treatment, such as number and type of chronic conditions and drugs, severity of chronic conditions (CIRS score), age, quality of life, deprivation, health literacy. RESULTS The GPs included 888 multimorbid patients. The overall median TBQ was 20 and the median VAS was 4. Both patients' and GPs' assessment of the burden of treatment were inversely associated with patients' age and quality of life. In addition, patients' assessment of their burden of treatment was associated with a higher deprivation score and lower health literacy, and with having diabetes or atrial fibrillation, whereas GPs' assessment of this burden was associated with the patient having a greater number of chronic conditions and drugs, and a higher CIRS score. CONCLUSION Both from patients' and GPs' perspectives TB appears to be higher in younger patients. Whereas for patients the burden of treatment is associated with socio-economic and psychological factors, GPs' assessments of this burden are associated with medical factors. Including socio-economic and psychological factors on patients' self-perception is likely to improve GPs' assessments of their patients' burden of treatment thus favoring patient-centered care.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Medical Education > Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)

UniBE Contributor:

Streit, Sven

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

1471-2296

Publisher:

BioMed Central

Language:

English

Submitter:

Andrea Flükiger-Flückiger

Date Deposited:

09 Jul 2019 11:50

Last Modified:

23 Oct 2019 02:32

Publisher DOI:

10.1186/s12875-019-0974-z

PubMed ID:

31253097

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Burden of treatment Chronic diseases Multimorbidity Primary care

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.131669

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/131669

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback