Design and quality criteria for archetype analysis

Eisenack, Klaus; Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio; Epstein, Graham; Kimmich, Christian; Magliocca, Nicholas; Manuel-Navarrete, David; Oberlack, Christoph; Roggero, Matteo; Sietz, Diana (2019). Design and quality criteria for archetype analysis. Ecology and Society, 24(3) Resilience Alliance Publications 10.5751/ES-10855-240306

[img]
Preview
Text (Design and quality criteria for archetype analysis)
2019_Eisenack et al - Design and quality criteria for archetype analysis.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

Download (239kB) | Preview

A key challenge in addressing the global degradation of natural resources and the environment is to effectively transfer successful strategies across heterogeneous contexts. Archetype analysis is a particularly salient approach in this regard that helps researchers to understand and compare patterns of (un)sustainability in heterogeneous cases. Archetype analysis avoids traps of overgeneralization and ideography by identifying reappearing but nonuniversal patterns that hold for well-defined subsets of cases. It can be applied by researchers working in inter- or transdisciplinary settings to study sustainability issues from a broad range of theoretical and methodological standpoints. However, there is still an urgent need for quality standards to guide the design of theoretically rigorous and practically useful archetype analyses. To this end, we propose four quality criteria and corresponding research strategies to address them: (1) specify the domain of validity for each archetype, (2) ensure that archetypes can be combined to characterize single cases, (3) explicitly navigate levels of abstraction, and (4) obtain a fit between attribute configurations, theories, and empirical domains of validity. These criteria are based on a stocktaking of current methodological challenges in archetypes research, including: to demonstrate the validity of the analysis, delineate boundaries of archetypes, and select appropriate attributes to define them. We thus contribute to a better common understanding of the approach and to the improvement of the research design of future archetype analyses.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

08 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography > Human Geography > Unit Urban & Regional Planing
08 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography > Human Geography
08 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography
10 Strategic Research Centers > Centre for Development and Environment (CDE)

UniBE Contributor:

Oberlack, Christoph

ISSN:

1708-3087

Publisher:

Resilience Alliance Publications

Projects:

[479] Archetypes of transnational land acquisitions
[805] Sustainability Governance

Language:

English

Submitter:

Stephan Schmidt

Date Deposited:

26 Aug 2019 16:27

Last Modified:

23 Oct 2019 12:16

Publisher DOI:

10.5751/ES-10855-240306

Uncontrolled Keywords:

abstraction; archetype analysis; generalization; ideographic trap; interdisciplinary collaboration; panacea; pattern; research design; social-ecological systems; qualitative; quantitative; validity

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.132558

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/132558

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback