Sponsorship of national and regional professional paediatrics associations by companies that make breast-milk substitutes: evidence from a review of official websites.

Grummer-Strawn, Laurence M; Holliday, Faire; Jungo, Katharina Tabea; Rollins, Nigel (2019). Sponsorship of national and regional professional paediatrics associations by companies that make breast-milk substitutes: evidence from a review of official websites. BMJ open, 9(8), e029035. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029035

[img]
Preview
Text
Grummer-Strawn BMJOpen 2019.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (315kB) | Preview

OBJECTIVES Professional paediatrics associations play an important role in promoting the highest standard of care for women and children. Education and guidelines must be made in the best interests of patients. Given the importance of breastfeeding for the health, development and survival of infants, children and mothers, paediatric associations have a particular responsibility to avoid conflicts of interest with companies that manufacture breast-milk substitutes (BMSs). The objective of this study was to investigate the extent to which national and regional paediatric associations are sponsored by BMS companies. METHODS Data were collected on national paediatric associations based on online searches of websites and Facebook pages. Sites were examined for evidence of financial sponsorship by the BMS industry, including funding of journals, newsletters or other publications, conferences and events, scholarships, fellowship, grants and awards. Payment for services, such as exhibitor space at conferences or events and paid advertisements in publications, was also noted. RESULTS Overall, 68 (60%) of the 114 paediatric associations with a website or Facebook account documented receiving financial support from BMS companies. Sponsorship, particularly of conferences or other events, was the most common type of financial support. The prevalence of conference sponsorship is highest in Europe and the Americas, where about half of the associations have BMS company-sponsored conferences. Thirty-one associations (27%) indicated that they received funding from BMS companies as payment for advertisements or exhibitor space. Only 18 associations (16%) have conflict of interest policies, guidelines, or criteria posted online. CONCLUSION Despite the well-documented importance of breastfeeding and the widespread recognition that commercial influences can shape the behaviours of healthcare professionals, national and regional paediatric associations commonly accept funding from companies that manufacture and distribute BMS. Paediatric associations should function without the influence of commercial interests.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Review Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Medical Education > Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)

Graduate School:

Graduate School for Health Sciences (GHS)

UniBE Contributor:

Jungo, Katharina Tabea

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

2044-6055

Publisher:

BMJ Publishing Group

Language:

English

Submitter:

Doris Kopp Heim

Date Deposited:

13 Aug 2019 13:26

Last Modified:

05 Sep 2019 12:51

Publisher DOI:

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029035

PubMed ID:

31401600

Uncontrolled Keywords:

conflict of interest funding infant formula paediatric associations sponsorship

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.132600

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/132600

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback