Noel, Antoine; Ploux, Sylvain; Bulliard, Samuel; Strik, Marc; Haeberlin, Andreas; Welte, Nicolas; Marchand, Hugo; Klotz, Nicolas; Ritter, Philippe; Haïssaguerre, Michel; Bordachar, Pierre (2020). Oversensing issues leading to device extraction: When subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator reached a dead-end. Heart rhythm, 17(1), pp. 66-74. Elsevier 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.07.004
Full text not available from this repository.BACKGROUND
Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantations are rapidly expanding. However, the subcutaneous detection and interpretation of cardiac signals in S-ICDs is much more challenging than by conventional devices. There is a complete paradigm shift in cardiac signal sensing with subcutaneous signal detection, leading in some cases to oversensing with restricted programming options.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this single-center study was to quantify and describe cases where recurring oversensing made the extraction of the device necessary.
METHODS
Consecutive patients (n = 108) implanted with an S-ICD in our tertiary referral hospital were considered for analysis. Clinical and remote monitoring data were analyzed.
RESULTS
The S-ICD had to be explanted in 6 of 108 implanted patients (5.6%) because of refractory oversensing issues: myopotential oversensing, P- or T-wave oversensing, rate-dependent left bundle branch block aberrancy during exercise with R-wave double counting, and R-wave amplitude decrease after ventricular tachycardia ablation leading to noise detection. Seventeen of 108 patients experienced oversensing (15.7%): 9 patients had at least 1 inappropriate charge without a shock (8.3%), 3 patients had at least 1 inappropriate shock (2.8%), and 5 patients had both episodes (4.6%).
CONCLUSION
So far, cardiologists have had to deal with transvenous ICD lead fractures, but signal oversensing without correcting programming option could be the equivalent weakness of S-ICDs, despite an adequate screening.
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit item |