Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial CBCTs: Reliability, reproducibility and segmentation effect on hard-tissue outcomes.

Häner, Simeon T.; Kanavakis, Georgios; Matthey, François; Gkantidis, Nikolaos (2020). Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial CBCTs: Reliability, reproducibility and segmentation effect on hard-tissue outcomes. Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 23(1), pp. 92-101. Wiley 10.1111/ocr.12347

Text ocr.12347.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (2MB)

OBJECTIVES

To test the reliability and reproducibility of a fast and user-friendly voxel-based 3D superimposition method and the effect of bone segmentation on its outcomes.

SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION

This prospective methodological study assessed 15 pairs of pre-existing serial CBCT images (interval: 1.69 ± 0.37 years) obtained from growing patients (initial age: 11.75 ± 0.59 years).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Volumes were superimposed on the anterior cranial base using Dolphin 3D software. Reliability was assessed visually, by inspecting the overlap of the superimposition reference structures. Reproducibility was tested with intra- and inter-operator comparisons of superimposition outcomes.

RESULTS

The method presented good reliability in all cases. The median differences between intra- and inter-operator comparisons at various tested areas ranged from 0.06 to 0.16 mm and from 0.15 to 0.24 mm, respectively. In few individual cases, differences exceeded 0.5 mm. There was no evidence that the error increased upon increase in the magnitude of the detected T0-T1 changes. However, the superimposition error increased when the distance between the measurement area and the superimposition reference also increased. For a single image, the median error of bone surface segmentation ranged in different areas between 0.05 and 0.12 mm, with few exceptions where it slightly exceeded 0.25 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The tested voxel-based superimposition method presented good efficiency, cranial base matching and reproducibility in a growing patient sample. Segmentation error was considered minimal. The total error reached clinically relevant levels in very few cases. Thus, this technique is considered appropriate for clinical use, when 3D assessment of craniofacial changes is required.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

2 since deposited on 24 Oct 2019
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item