Personalise antidepressant treatment for unipolar depression combining individual choices, risks and big data (PETRUSHKA): rationale and protocol.

Tomlinson, Anneka; Furukawa, Toshi A; Efthimiou, Orestis; Salanti, Georgia; De Crescenzo, Franco; Singh, Ilina; Cipriani, Andrea (2020). Personalise antidepressant treatment for unipolar depression combining individual choices, risks and big data (PETRUSHKA): rationale and protocol. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 23(2), pp. 52-56. BMJ Publishing Group 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300118

[img]
Preview
Text
Tomlinson EvidBasedMentHealth 2020.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (326kB) | Preview

INTRODUCTION Matching treatment to specific patients is too often a matter of trial and error, while treatment efficacy should be optimised by limiting risks and costs and by incorporating patients' preferences. Factors influencing an individual's drug response in major depressive disorder may include a number of clinical variables (such as previous treatments, severity of illness, concomitant anxiety etc) as well demographics (for instance, age, weight, social support and family history). Our project, funded by the National Institute of Health Research, is aimed at developing and subsequently testing a precision medicine approach to the pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder in adults, which can be used in everyday clinical settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will jointly synthesise data from patients with major depressive disorder, obtained from diverse datasets, including randomised trials as well as observational, real-world studies. We will summarise the highest quality and most up-to-date scientific evidence about comparative effectiveness and tolerability (adverse effects) of antidepressants for major depressive disorder, develop and externally validate prediction models to produce stratified treatment recommendations. Results from this analysis will subsequently inform a web-based platform and build a decision support tool combining the stratified recommendations with clinicians and patients' preferences, to adapt the tool, increase its' reliability and tailor treatment indications to the individual-patient level. We will then test whether use of the tool relative to treatment as usual in real-world clinical settings leads to enhanced treatment adherence and response, is acceptable to clinicians and patients, and is economically viable in the UK National Health Service. DISCUSSION This is a clinically oriented study, coordinated by an international team of experts, with important implications for patients treated in real-world setting. This project will form a test-case that, if effective, will be extended to non-pharmacological treatments (either face-to-face or internet-delivered), to other populations and disorders in psychiatry (for instance, children and adolescents, or schizophrenia and treatment-resistant depression) and to other fields of medicine.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Further Contribution)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Pre-clinic Human Medicine > Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM)

UniBE Contributor:

Efthimiou, Orestis and Salanti, Georgia

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services

ISSN:

1362-0347

Publisher:

BMJ Publishing Group

Language:

English

Submitter:

Andrea Flükiger-Flückiger

Date Deposited:

29 Oct 2019 12:37

Last Modified:

28 May 2020 06:14

Publisher DOI:

10.1136/ebmental-2019-300118

PubMed ID:

31645364

Uncontrolled Keywords:

adult psychiatry depression and mood disorders

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.134290

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/134290

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback