Predicting species abundances in a grassland biodiversity experiment: Trade‐offs between model complexity and generality

Clark, Adam Thomas; Ann Turnbull, Lindsay; Tredennick, Andrew; Allan, Eric; Harpole, W. Stanley; Mayfield, Margaret M.; Soliveres, Santiago; Barry, Kathryn; Eisenhauer, Nico; Kroon, Hans; Rosenbaum, Benjamin; Wagg, Cameron; Weigelt, Alexandra; Feng, Yanhao; Roscher, Christiane; Schmid, Bernhard (2020). Predicting species abundances in a grassland biodiversity experiment: Trade‐offs between model complexity and generality. Journal of ecology, 108(2), pp. 774-787. Wiley 10.1111/1365-2745.13316

Preview	Text 2019_JEcol.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview
Preview	Text 2020_JEcol_108_774.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview

Models of natural processes necessarily sacrifice some realism for the sake of tractability. Detailed, parameter‐rich models often provide accurate estimates of system behaviour but can be data‐hungry and difficult to operationalize. Moreover, complexity increases the danger of ‘over‐fitting’, which leads to poor performance when models are applied to novel conditions. This challenge is typically described in terms of a trade‐off between bias and variance (i.e. low accuracy vs. low precision).
In studies of ecological communities, this trade‐off often leads to an argument about the level of detail needed to describe interactions among species. Here, we used data from a grassland biodiversity experiment containing nine locally abundant plant species (the Jena ‘dominance experiment’) to parameterize models representing six increasingly complex hypotheses about interactions. For each model, we calculated goodness‐of‐fit across different subsets of the data based on sown species richness levels, and tested how performance changed depending on whether or not the same data were used to parameterize and test the model (i.e. within vs. out‐of‐sample), and whether the range of diversity treatments being predicted fell inside or outside of the range used for parameterization.
As expected, goodness‐of‐fit improved as a function of model complexity for all within‐sample tests. In contrast, the best out‐of‐sample performance generally resulted from models of intermediate complexity (i.e. with only two interaction coefficients per species—an intraspecific effect and a single pooled interspecific effect), especially for predictions that fell outside the range of diversity treatments used for parameterization. In accordance with other studies, our results also demonstrate that commonly used selection methods based on AIC of models fitted to the full dataset correspond more closely to within‐sample than out‐of‐sample performance.
Synthesis. Our results demonstrate that models which include only general intra and interspecific interaction coefficients can be sufficient for estimating species‐level abundances across a wide range of contexts and may provide better out‐of‐sample performance than do more complex models. These findings serve as a reminder that simpler models may often provide a better trade‐off between bias and variance in ecological systems, particularly when applying models beyond the conditions used to parameterize them.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

260 since deposited on 26 Nov 2019
47 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item