Equilibrium radionuclide angiography: Intra- and inter-observer repeatability and reproducibility in the assessment of cardiac systolic and diastolic function.

Sachpekidis, Christos; Sachpekidis, Vasileios; Kopp-Schneider, Annette; Arsos, George; Moralidis, Efstratios (2021). Equilibrium radionuclide angiography: Intra- and inter-observer repeatability and reproducibility in the assessment of cardiac systolic and diastolic function. Journal of nuclear cardiology, 28(4), pp. 1304-1314. Springer 10.1007/s12350-019-01830-9

Text Sachpekidis_Equilibrium radionuclide angiography Intra- and inter-observer repeatability and reproducibility in the assessment of cardiac systolic and diastolic function.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (485kB)

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement in assessing the systolic and diastolic function with equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two adults underwent baseline and repeat ERNA. An experienced and a trainee operator analyzed the data by assigning regions of interest manually, fully automatically, and semi-automatically. The Bland-Altman statistic (mean ± 1.96 standard deviations of the differences) was used to assess the repeatability (two different assessments of a single acquisition) and reproducibility (assessments of two different acquisitions).

RESULTS

Using the semi-automated technique the intraobserver repeatability and reproducibility of left ventricular ejection fraction for the experienced physician were - 0.1 ± 3.7 and 0.0 ± 3.8 and for the trainee 2.2 ± 10.6 and 1.9 ± 8.4, respectively. The inter-observer repeatability and reproducibility were - 1.8 ± 6.4 and 0.4 ± 9.0, respectively. Among the parameters of diastolic function, the intraobserver repeatability and reproducibility of the peak filling rate for the experienced physician were - 0.0 ± 1.1 and - 0.1 ± 1.1 and for the trainee 0.2 ± 3.5 and 0.4 ± 3.7, respectively. The inter-observer repeatability and reproducibility were 0.3 ± 1.5 and 0.5 ± 4.0, respectively. Similar was the pattern for the other diastolic indices. In all cases the limits of agreement varied according to the quantification approach.

CONCLUSION

A good repeatability but a moderate reproducibility was found in the assessment of the LVEF. Less good were the findings in the assessment of diastolic function.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

1 since deposited on 18 Dec 2019
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item