Comparing diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT, contrast enhanced CT and combined imaging in patients with suspected vascular graft infections.

Husmann, Lars; Huellner, Martin W; Ledergerber, Bruno; Anagnostopoulos, Alexia; Stolzmann, Paul; Sah, Bert-Ram; Burger, Irene A; Rancic, Zoran; Hasse, Barbara (2019). Comparing diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT, contrast enhanced CT and combined imaging in patients with suspected vascular graft infections. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 46(6), pp. 1359-1368. Springer-Verlag 10.1007/s00259-018-4205-y

Preview

Text sah_Comp10.1007_s00259-018-4205-y.pdf - Published Version Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (6MB) | Preview

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (PET/CT), contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), and a combined imaging approach (CE-PET/CT) in patients with suspected vascular graft infection (VGI).

METHODS

PET/CT and CE-CT were performed prospectively in 23 patients with suspected VGI. Diagnostic accuracy for PET/CT was assessed by using previously suggested cut-off points for maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) measured in the vicinity of the graft. Using a new 4-point scale for visual grading, two readers independently assessed the diagnostic accuracy for CE-CT and combined CE-PET/CT. Microbiological culture, obtained after open biopsy or graft explantation, and clinical follow-up of the patients served as the standard of reference.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy of PET/CT for the diagnosis of VGI was 100%, 50%, 100%, 72.2%, and 78.3%, using the most favorable SUVmax cut-off ≥ 4.9. Respective values for CE-CT were 100%, 50%, 100%, 72.2%, and 78.3% for reader 1, and 92.3%, 80%, 88.9%, 85.7%, and 86.9% for reader 2; while respective values for combined CE-PET/CT were 100%, 70%, 100%, 81.3%, and 86.9% for reader 1, and 100%, 80%, 100%, 86.7%, and 91.3% for reader 2. Additionally, imaging provided a conclusive clinical diagnosis in patients without graft infection (i.e., other sites of infection): five of ten patients with CE-CT, six of ten patients with PET/CT, and seven of ten patients with combined CE-PET/CT.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of combined CE-PET/CT in patients with suspected VGI is very high. The combination of the high sensitivity of PET/CT in detecting metabolically active foci in infection, and the high specificity of CE-CT in detecting anatomic alterations, appears to be the reason why combined imaging outperforms stand-alone imaging in diagnosing VGI and may be supportive in future decision-making of difficult cases of suspected VGI. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01821664.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

116 since deposited on 17 Jan 2020
65 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item