Pre-induction checklists and discomfort in patients. An observational study

Nabecker, Sabine; Schwendimann, Désirée; Theiler, Lorenz; Pedersen, Tina; Greif, Robert (2020). Pre-induction checklists and discomfort in patients. An observational study. European journal of anaesthesiology, 37(10), pp. 842-846. Wolters Kluwer 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001138

[img] Text
Nabegger_Preinduction checklists_EJA_2019.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (654kB) | Request a copy
[img] Text (Pre-induction checklists and discomfort in patients. An observational study)
Pre_induction_checklists_and_discomfort_in.3.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to registered users only
Available under License Publisher holds Copyright.

Download (121kB) | Request a copy

BACKGROUND

Since the WHO release of the Safe Surgery Saves Lives Program in 2008, peri-operative checklists minimise errors and improve patient safety worldwide. Anaesthesia professionals are often reluctant to use these checklists in front of patients because they fear causing patients' discomfort before anaesthesia and surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the subjective level of patient discomfort caused by the use of pre-operative checklists with the patient discomfort estimated by anaesthesia providers.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

The current single-centre trial included 110 anaesthesia providers and 125 nonpremedicated ear, nose and throat or maxillofacial surgery patients in Switzerland from June to August 2016. Inclusion criterion: signed general research consent.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

received premedication, less than 18 years old, day-care patients, dementia or other mental illnesses.

INTERVENTIONS

Anaesthesia healthcare providers and patients before surgery and on the first postoperative day were asked to rate three statements: MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All statements were rated on a 100-mm visual analogue scale, where 0 meant no agreement and 100 meant total agreement.

RESULTS

Patients overwhelmingly agreed that anaesthesia providers should use checklists in front of them. Anaesthesia providers rated the patient discomfort much higher than actually perceived by patients. Both, patients and anaesthesia providers rated the possibility of reducing the risk of errors high.

CONCLUSION

Patients experience far less discomfort observing the use of pre-induction checklists than anaesthesia providers expect. Patients value the potential safety benefit significantly higher than anaesthesia providers. These results further support the implementation of peri-operative checklists in the operating room environment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The current observational study had no intervention, therefore, was not registered.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

04 Faculty of Medicine > Department of Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology (DINA) > Clinic and Policlinic for Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy

UniBE Contributor:

Nabecker, Sabine; Schwendimann-Stähli, Désirée Denise; Theiler, Lorenz; Pedersen, Tina Heidi and Greif, Robert

Subjects:

600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health

ISSN:

1365-2346

Publisher:

Wolters Kluwer

Language:

English

Submitter:

Jeannie Wurz

Date Deposited:

20 Jan 2020 15:45

Last Modified:

07 Oct 2020 10:35

Publisher DOI:

10.1097/EJA.0000000000001138

PubMed ID:

31860603

Additional Information:

Titel bei Import:
"Use of pre-induction checklists causes less discomfort in patients than anaesthesia providers expect: An observational study" (online ahead of print)

BORIS DOI:

10.7892/boris.137517

URI:

https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/137517

Actions (login required)

Edit item Edit item
Provide Feedback