2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Soar, Jasmeet; Maconochie, Ian; Wyckoff, Myra H; Olasveengen, Theresa M; Singletary, Eunice M; Greif, Robert; Aickin, Richard; Bhanji, Farhan; Donnino, Michael W; Mancini, Mary E; Wyllie, Jonathan P; Zideman, David; Andersen, Lars W; Atkins, Dianne L; Aziz, Khalid; Bendall, Jason; Berg, Katherine M; Berry, David C; Bigham, Blair L; Bingham, Robert; ... (2019). 2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation, 145, pp. 95-150. Elsevier 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.10.016

Text (Consensus guidelines) Soar_Greif_CoSTR_Consensus CPR_Resuscitation_2019.pdf - Published Version Restricted to registered users only Available under License Publisher holds Copyright. Download (625kB)

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the third annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. It addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. This summary addresses the role of cardiac arrest centers and dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults and children, vasopressors in adults, advanced airway interventions in adults and children, targeted temperature management in children after cardiac arrest, initial oxygen concentration during resuscitation of newborns, and interventions for presyncope by first aid providers. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the certainty of the evidence on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence to Decision Framework Highlights sections. The task forces also listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

Interest & Impact

Downloads

4 since deposited on 17 Feb 2020
0 in the past 12 months

Citations

5 Citations in Web of Science ®
6 Citations in Scopus

Search

in Google Scholar™

Services

Actions (login required)

Edit item

Actions (login required)

Edit item